Highlights - Booooom! on 22:24 - Aug 13 with 2664 views | kropotkin41 | That may not be the link you think it is. | |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
Highlights - Booooom! on 22:26 - Aug 13 with 2624 views | bosh67 |
Highlights - Booooom! on 22:24 - Aug 13 by kropotkin41 | That may not be the link you think it is. |
It is now! | |
| |
Highlights - Booooom! on 22:45 - Aug 13 with 2341 views | FDC | Some peaches in there, Wells, Chair, their first and the free kick. Some well taken pens too. I notice Sky are still calling it Loftus Road btw. | | | |
Highlights - Booooom! on 22:51 - Aug 13 with 2287 views | eghamranger | Thanks for posting that. Would have been a good nite!! | | | |
Highlights - Booooom! on 23:23 - Aug 13 with 2072 views | qpr1976 | Watching that, we won 3-2 and didn’t need Pens. No footage of their equaliser !? | | | |
Highlights - Booooom! on 08:02 - Aug 14 with 1636 views | nix |
Highlights - Booooom! on 22:45 - Aug 13 by FDC | Some peaches in there, Wells, Chair, their first and the free kick. Some well taken pens too. I notice Sky are still calling it Loftus Road btw. |
Can we tweet them when they do that (I was at the match so didn't watch Sky). No problem with our fans calling it LR, can quite understand their reasoning, but the WHOLE POINT of the name change is to bring publicity to the charity and we need TV to do it for us. | | | |
Highlights - Booooom! on 08:51 - Aug 14 with 1510 views | Toast_R |
Highlights - Booooom! on 23:23 - Aug 13 by qpr1976 | Watching that, we won 3-2 and didn’t need Pens. No footage of their equaliser !? |
I just noticed that, terrible business. Also , did Kane's penalty not cross the line, looked well in? [Post edited 14 Aug 2019 8:52]
| | | |
Highlights - Booooom! on 09:04 - Aug 14 with 1452 views | ozranger |
Highlights - Booooom! on 08:51 - Aug 14 by Toast_R | I just noticed that, terrible business. Also , did Kane's penalty not cross the line, looked well in? [Post edited 14 Aug 2019 8:52]
|
As stated in another thread, it was the second, not the third goal that was missed. Sky are pretty pathetic. And, as also stated, it was quite a cracker of a strike from way out on the right that flew over Kelly and into the top left corner. No. Kane's strike did not cross the line. Even if it hit their keeper and went in, it would not count as forward motion would have stopped. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
Highlights - Booooom! on 10:16 - Aug 14 with 1342 views | FDC | Watching again, not on a phone screen this time, our penalty looked a very soft decision! | | | |
Highlights - Booooom! on 18:04 - Aug 14 with 1054 views | PinnerPaul |
Highlights - Booooom! on 09:04 - Aug 14 by ozranger | As stated in another thread, it was the second, not the third goal that was missed. Sky are pretty pathetic. And, as also stated, it was quite a cracker of a strike from way out on the right that flew over Kelly and into the top left corner. No. Kane's strike did not cross the line. Even if it hit their keeper and went in, it would not count as forward motion would have stopped. |
Just for the record that is NOT correct. Penalty kick is only 'complete' "….....when the ball stops moving" No mention of forward motion in LOTG. | | | |
| |