By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
By all accounts his wages will be paid by 32 Red whilst he is a Ram and he will wear the 32 shirt. Knowing Mel's aversion to profligacy I am not surprised he has found a way to get a player for little to no outlay which will have no impact on their FFP assessment. At first I thought that the EFL would surely put a stop to it but the thought occurred to me; is this not the same as when the fans paid the players wages at QPR during the dark days? There doesn't appear to be any suggestion of 3rd party ownership so it would seem that Derby are blame free on this one. Thoughts?
The grass is always greener.
-1
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 14:19 - Oct 9 with 2957 views
They could include various add ons like reserving a seat on the bench, speedy wing play and Barbet could get bonus payments for removing the undercarriage off the opposition.
This actually opens up a real can of worms and I cant see the difference between paying for a players wages or accepting outside sponsorship money for naming parts of your stadium
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 14:19 - Oct 9 by CamberleyR
Have you been on the moon the last two months Esox?
I was aware of the story when it broke, even on the dark side of the moon, but the connection between his wages being paid and QPR's history only arose today.
The grass is always greener.
0
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 14:56 - Oct 9 with 2834 views
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 19:53 - Oct 9 by Juzzie
Isnt paying his wages by another company effectively 3rd party ownership, which isn’t allowed
What is happening here though is that Rooney is being paid the thick end of £5m for his troubles by Derby, and Bet32 are sponsoring Derby a convenient thick end of £5m at the same time...
Can we not knock it?
0
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 01:59 - Oct 10 with 2049 views
i was never one to dislike Rooney, always ready to do his best for England when others would pull out with spurious injuries and his private life, well, should be just that (Albeit he needs to understand how despicable the sex trade is), but this stinks - conflicts of interest (Including issues with third party ownership), the involvement of on-line gambling companies (NOT a fan), and Derby's whole approach to circumnavigating the rules and the efl's complicity in that while other clubs have been hammered in a number of ways.
Hope he effing bombs.
Fck their chairman
0
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 08:43 - Oct 10 with 1874 views
I can’t remember who cut up rough when the Wintons directly sponsored the Shittu and DouDou signings but I think Bentford were at the front of the queue on that whingefest???
This is absolutely no different apart from Harold and the boys were upfront on their payments. Clearly they should’ve set up a circumventing scheme as Derby have. Not sure this can be stretched to also be comparable to Faurlingate but I’ll moan about it in any case.
Derby really are a classless bunch of fcukwits though.... shame as I used to quite like them; now they just seem to rankle
Cherish and enjoy life.... this ain't no dress rehearsal
0
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 08:52 - Oct 10 with 1853 views
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 08:43 - Oct 10 by Lblock
I can’t remember who cut up rough when the Wintons directly sponsored the Shittu and DouDou signings but I think Bentford were at the front of the queue on that whingefest???
This is absolutely no different apart from Harold and the boys were upfront on their payments. Clearly they should’ve set up a circumventing scheme as Derby have. Not sure this can be stretched to also be comparable to Faurlingate but I’ll moan about it in any case.
Derby really are a classless bunch of fcukwits though.... shame as I used to quite like them; now they just seem to rankle
Did we have FFP when the Wintons were helping keep a club going that could so easily have been lost?
If we didn't, then they were benefactors, the same as any person donating to their club.
This is Derby taking the piss out of the Football League, it's rules and therefore QPR and the other 69 clubs.
1
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 09:01 - Oct 10 with 1845 views
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 07:29 - Oct 10 by distortR
i was never one to dislike Rooney, always ready to do his best for England when others would pull out with spurious injuries and his private life, well, should be just that (Albeit he needs to understand how despicable the sex trade is), but this stinks - conflicts of interest (Including issues with third party ownership), the involvement of on-line gambling companies (NOT a fan), and Derby's whole approach to circumnavigating the rules and the efl's complicity in that while other clubs have been hammered in a number of ways.
Hope he effing bombs.
Fck their chairman
Got to laugh really. Derby going to all this trouble to be 13th in the championship and hated by all and sundry.
Shrek going to Derby in January. on 12:19 - Oct 10 by daveB
If 32 red are paying for him is that not 3rd party ownership?
You’d have thought so. Unless he’s signing a short term contract with Derby on little or no money and getting a huge shirt sponsorship deal from 32 Red for the same period. No idea how that kind of arrangement works out legally.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
