What a difference a few days makes in the fast-paced world of football. One minute we are beating Chelsea in one of our best performances of the past couple of seasons and then we are losing to Wolverhampton Wanderers. Matt Watts give his view !

Coming off the back of an excellent 2-1 home win against Chelsea, there was every hope Saints would carry the momentum into Saturday’s trip to Wolverhampton Wanderers.

Unfortunately, as it so often the case with the inconsistency we see from Ralph Hasenhuttl’s side, that didn’t happen and we trudged home from Molineux suffering a 1-0 defeat.

My interpretation of the game was somewhat different to the Saints boss, whose disappointment at not taking something from the trip superseded any acknowledgment his selections could have altered the outcome.

I find it somewhat frustrating when he does this. No-one can argue that the club delivered a really positive transfer window with some shrewd and exciting business having secured a brilliant result against the Blues.

As I had pointed out in Watt View last week https://www.fansnetwork.co.uk/football/southampton/news/58407/watt-view-future-b prior to transfer deadline day, the future is bright but a deadly finisher would no doubt accelerate the pace of change.

We didn’t secure that proven goalscorer but the future remains extremely bright. I don’t want to dwell on the absence of a new striker as, like I also explained last week, we have decent attacking options in the squad and we have also made quality signings. Credit to all at the club for making that happen.

The key, however, is making sure we use them.
What was disappointing for me yet again was the absence of Stuart Armstrong and Sekou Mara from the starting line-up. This was something I mentioned in my previous column and Armstrong’s introduction on 56 minutes in particular made a significant difference to the shape and impact of the team.

Stuart offers more strength, direction and threat than his namesake Adam, although no-one disputes the former Blackburn man’s effort levels. Moi Elyounoussi, who has offered glimpses of his talent in spells so far, is also inconsistent and that was evident at Molineux.

Hasenhuttl left it until 83 minutes to bring Frenchman Mara into the fold which was far too late for me. He did bring ex-Manchester City youngster Samuel Edozie on 10 minutes earlier and he showed just why he is so highly rated, displaying pace, trickery and ability in abundance. Hugely exciting prospect - could we have seen him earlier?

Unfortunately, Joe Aribo - a fantastic signing and someone who will be key to success this season and into the future - made way for Edozie on 73 minutes. I can’t help but feel Stuart Armstrong and Mara either side of Aribo with Che Adams up top from the off would have changed the structure of the game for Saints.

Equally, having seen his first appearance, Edozie would have posed more of an attacking threat than Elyounoussi. Either way, he or Mara could have started to take the momentum from Tuesday’s win into the game - particularly when Hasenhuttl talks so regularly about the impact of the workload of the team and the need to freshen things up.

Instead, it was a case of Saints being fairly ineffective in the opening 45 minutes despite much of the play and finding themselves 1-0 down to a poor goal conceded from a failed attack. It could have been different and it should have been after Tuesday’s performance and against what was a fairly weak Wolves team.

In Hasenhuttl’s defence, the one issue he was unable to address was that of the absence of Romeo Lavia with a hamstring injury. The 18-year-old has been a revelation so far this season, topped off by his stunning strike against Chelsea. Having seen Oriol Romeu leave for La Liga outfit Girona, missing both of them was a problem.

When asked if he was disappointed with the first half, Hasenhuttl said: "No, I haven't seen too many chances from the opponent, and we have had some good moments where we entered the box and maybe the last pass wasn't there. But no, absolutely ok.

“We tried everything in the second half to turn things around after conceding the goal in the end of the first half, in the one situation where it was not so good and they killed us in this moment.

“This is the one criticism I can have of my team that we had this one moment where we did not pay attention. The rest was exactly what we tried to do, we spin the wheels, we create chances and went all in with the young lads, good impact from those, they were brave and we forced them to make mistakes.”

He added: "When you see the workload we put on the pitch in every game, it is not surprising that we use all five subs today. It was necessary and the good thing is we can do this now and we have these players on the bench who can help us.“

I personally don’t agree with his assessment of the first half - there is no doubt the second half was better after the introduction of the substitutes and, while the opposition’s opportunities were limited, Saints gained no advantage and actually found themselves behind.

The second point I take issue with is the comment around trying everything in the second half to turn things round. If the right and most effective team was selected from the start against Wolves, we could have seen the benefit of going ahead against an average side who had not won a game prior to this fixture and who looked vulnerable.

The comments around the use of substitutes in light of the workload of the team each game also doesn’t make sense to me given he could have started players who didn’t start or even play a part on Tuesday, for instance Stuart Armstrong or Mara.

It concerns me to see the manager focus on the use of substitutes to help the team as it suggests his thinking is more on how the game will play out as opposed to taking the game to teams regardless of their level.

As was clear from Saturday, it ultimately didn’t help as Saints fell to defeat with the players who could make the greatest difference reduced to 30 mins or less.

I hope to see Stuart Armstrong, Mara and Edozie receiving more game time and opportunities to start games with the run of fixtures up next in Brentford, Aston Villa and Everton.

In previous weeks I have said logical decisions and an ability to adapt are needed and it was decisive and logical action which led to the first win of the season against Leicester. That wasn’t the case for me on Saturday and the result tells the story. A missed opportunity.

Photo: Action Images

lemmsy added 18:03 - Sep 4 A couple of points here substitutions are massive in today’s football, hence five are now allowed and particularly with the way saints play. Secondly there’s no accounting for che’s miss & you certainly can’t judge the manager on that . On a personal opinion I don’t think Adam Armstrong is quite good enough at the top level,of course he puts in a massive effort but for me he makes to many wrong decisions at crucial times

2

ItchenNorth added 18:21 - Sep 4 Che has got to score those, then it's a different match report and reflection on the afternoons works. Ralph can not put those chances away, Che has to. We have a much better squad this season so Ralph can mix it up now. I'd like to see Mara and Edozie, but hey, it's a game of opinions. At least we have some depth now.
1

IanRC added 20:17 - Sep 4 Agree with most of this. Think Moi has been particularly poor and should not start the next few games. Thought Lavia was a big miss too.
3

sidsaint added 20:19 - Sep 4 Good constructive report and yes we are all agreed that football is about scoring goals and so the piece missing in the jigsaw is a big piece.
3

Ali_Diarea added 20:41 - Sep 4 I don’t disagree with anything you have written and it’s always good to get a different perspective but there is the age old adage that you shouldn’t change a winning team (although there were a couple of enforced changes). Had Ralph started with a different set of players from those who beat Chelsea, and we didn’t win against Wolves, everyone would of been on his back. Sometimes you can’t win as a football manager…

0

JoeEgg added 21:36 - Sep 4 Refreshing to read a very different perspective on the match - and much closer to that of my own - than the one expressed by our manager. We were playing a struggling Wolves side, and we had just beaten Chelsea, and the way we lined up and played managed just a single shot on target for the first two thids of the match! We did not play like a time brim full of confidence and looking for an important away win - not that is until it was far too late. We read that a member of the new coaching staff has left after a few months although its not completely clear why. Yes it is fair to say that sometimes you cant win as a football manager. But my consistent view is that Ralph manages to get it wrong far too many times.

-2

smartjoe added 23:39 - Sep 4 I totally agree with the analysis given by Matt Watts. Our squad is now packed out with young and also experienced talent but I fear that our Ralph is not capable of using it to our best advantage. His team selections, tactics and his use of substitutes are quite often ridiculous. I often read comments praising him for keeping us in the Premiership but a more accurate statement would say that we have stayed in despite him.

-3

JimmyMeliaPhD added 00:31 - Sep 5 i agree with the previous couple of comments. It is despite RH that we have survived. He has DEFIED PL MANAGERIAL GRAVITY for 3+ years. But every time we get a result the delusional "supporters" (whom I applaud only because they'll support us when we're in the championship as well), come out acting as if we're now saved, ignoring 3+ solid years of MISMANAGEMENT by RH. As this article articulates, he is still getting it wrong pretty much every week.

-2

YosemiteSaint added 02:32 - Sep 5 Yesterday's loss was entirely down to this: We lack a large lad with a big head who does nothing but stand round the opponents' six-yard box, make a nuisance of himself, and knock balls into the net.
1

AmericanSaint added 03:42 - Sep 5 I disagree with the majority of this except Mo E should have not started and Stu A should have. The rest of the team selection was fine, especially based on the Chelsea game. Yes, some of the subs should have come on sooner, but that is about as much of an agreement as you will get from me. Wolves took their one chance on the counterattack after we could not get the ball in deep. Only time will tell, but remember we have spent more in the last transfer window than the previous 2, maybe 3, combined. So all the RH haters and moaners who blame him for the loses but never the wins, try and remember that it goes both ways. And as a side note, I am a RH supporter but also know he has had a good amount of time and if we are not holding midtable at Christmas, I will join the group who want him gone. September will be a moth with lots of opportunities to gain points and many beatable teams, so let us chalk this one up to some back luck and move on to Brentford, which will be a test for sure. COYR

4

Block8 added 10:57 - Sep 5 I'm with AmericanSaint on the first part of his comments, maybe not all of them. The manager of any side has to temper his selections with the fact that we have to defend as well as attack. AA down the left offers that option as does Ely on the right, I might be persuaded to change Ely for SA now and again but it has worked, neither of them missed an open goal. Strangely AA had a great game against Leeds when he came on, again against Chelsea (and Man U for that matter) and scored but then deserves to be left out? Not sure where that comes from!

1

SWH1748 added 11:08 - Sep 5 Totally agree that Mo E should be rested, he missed a sitter v Chelsea but no one mention it because we won the game. Che really should score there also. Substitutes- why bring on Dj for Diablo to play up front then 15 mins later bring Maitland Niles on for Perraud and Edozie on for Aribo, pushing DJ back to defend. Ralph knew Perraud lacks match fitness so surely his first sub should have been Edozie and Maitland Niles coming on for Diallo and Aribo this leaving DJ to come on for Perraud. An extra 17 mins on the pitch for Edozie would have caused havoc for Wolves.

3

Blogs 31 bloggers

Queens Park Rangers Polls