| Rushworth not first choice at Hull 00:13 - Sep 21 with 2937 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Of course we are not long into the season but Carl Rushworth is not first choice at Hull city. One wonders what Brighton were thinking in sending him there instead of Swansea where he would certainly been playing every week.
Al these clubs have highly paid operators but many do not get what they expect or an understanding of how thing should pan out.
Swansea were forced to act out of the Brighton people dithering over this matter. Having said that Premier league clubs do not concern themselves over the needs of Championship clubs
|  |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |  |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 07:46 - Sep 21 with 2423 views | EagleEye |
Our player of the year & a good shot stopper. Young, with still a lot to learn & was prone to more than the odd error over the course of the season. Difficult to understand Brighton’s thinking on this one. On the plus side for us his value will drop so may be an opportunity for us down the line. Happy with what I’ve see from Vig so far |  | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 08:10 - Sep 21 with 2395 views | Whiterockin |
Good move by the club not to get involved with the numbers involved with the Rushworth loan. After what I felt was a shaky start Vigouroux has been excellent, plus he is our player. Back up, he was third choice and he won't be there after Christmas unless things change. |  | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:06 - Sep 21 with 2258 views | QJumpingJack |
I wonder that if Swansea's budget has been reduced season-on-season then maybe we could never have afforded to bring him back in the first place.
Also Brighton would have wanted their players to go out on loan to clubs who could be challenging at the top. Maybe Brighton looked at Swansea and thought we would struggle....? |  | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:16 - Sep 21 with 2232 views | max936 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 08:10 - Sep 21 by Whiterockin |
Good move by the club not to get involved with the numbers involved with the Rushworth loan. After what I felt was a shaky start Vigouroux has been excellent, plus he is our player. Back up, he was third choice and he won't be there after Christmas unless things change. |
Swans got a game at Coventry today yet threads about an ex player who was here on LOAN incredible.
So who cares he's not here, so its Brighton and Hull's problem nothing to do with us, bollox to the three of them!
Pointless thread  |  |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:37 - Sep 21 with 2191 views | KeithHaynes |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:16 - Sep 21 by max936 |
Swans got a game at Coventry today yet threads about an ex player who was here on LOAN incredible.
So who cares he's not here, so its Brighton and Hull's problem nothing to do with us, bollox to the three of them!
Pointless thread |
It’s what makes the world go around, chat, opinions, and is good for the site. |  |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:39 - Sep 21 with 2184 views | Fireboy2 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:16 - Sep 21 by max936 |
Swans got a game at Coventry today yet threads about an ex player who was here on LOAN incredible.
So who cares he's not here, so its Brighton and Hull's problem nothing to do with us, bollox to the three of them!
Pointless thread |
This is coming from the man who gets wound up by res 🤣🤣🤣🤣 |  | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:42 - Sep 21 with 2169 views | Fireboy2 |
Fwiw even though its a pointless thread, I'm glad he isn't with us as the big vig has been doing great for us.
Only 3 goals conceded in 5 league games shows how good he is, the centre halves are more confident knowing they have a vocal confident keeper behind them. | | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:54 - Sep 21 with 2154 views | max936 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:37 - Sep 21 by KeithHaynes |
It’s what makes the world go around, chat, opinions, and is good for the site. |
Fair enough. Mister. | |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:56 - Sep 21 with 2139 views | KeithHaynes |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:54 - Sep 21 by max936 |
Fair enough. Mister. |
Thank you indeed 😉 | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:58 - Sep 21 with 2132 views | max936 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:39 - Sep 21 by Fireboy2 |
This is coming from the man who gets wound up by res 🤣🤣🤣🤣 |
Not at all, I just got a good memory from his past postings, which were unpalatable and not acceptable in my opinion.
Anyway, Im out of this! | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 11:07 - Sep 21 with 2102 views | Fireboy2 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:58 - Sep 21 by max936 |
Not at all, I just got a good memory from his past postings, which were unpalatable and not acceptable in my opinion.
Anyway, Im out of this! |
It doesn't matter if you are correct S, he will always come back with a reply that will wind people up. | | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 12:52 - Sep 21 with 1975 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
I posted it on Friday. I try to understand how things work and explain it on here. It seems Brighton saw it a a cash exercise.
Rushworth might be wondering why cash rich Brighton put their bank balance a higher priority over his career development especially if he fill his potential he will be a £30m keeper.
Some people want to control the narratives. | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 13:27 - Sep 21 with 1923 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 10:58 - Sep 21 by max936 |
Not at all, I just got a good memory from his past postings, which were unpalatable and not acceptable in my opinion.
Anyway, Im out of this! |
This type of post is unfair. I would not go so far as to call it cowardly. Little slurs then you run away.
I cannot defend myself with moderator D telling me not to be confrontational.
There is no doubt Swansea were in for this boy. Brighton chose cash over his development.. | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 13:46 - Sep 21 with 1903 views | Fireboy2 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 13:27 - Sep 21 by ReslovenSwan1 |
This type of post is unfair. I would not go so far as to call it cowardly. Little slurs then you run away.
I cannot defend myself with moderator D telling me not to be confrontational.
There is no doubt Swansea were in for this boy. Brighton chose cash over his development.. |
Do not, I repeat, do not reply to this post. | | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:12 - Sep 21 with 1869 views | onehunglow |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 13:27 - Sep 21 by ReslovenSwan1 |
This type of post is unfair. I would not go so far as to call it cowardly. Little slurs then you run away.
I cannot defend myself with moderator D telling me not to be confrontational.
There is no doubt Swansea were in for this boy. Brighton chose cash over his development.. |
I fail to see how your posts are confrontational in any way
I’m disappointed to read that
I see posts from the likes of super fans as far more so ,those who instruct others not to reply to yiu
I REPEAT,DO NOT REPLY ….just what scale of arrogance is that
A poster setting himself up as some kind of grandee, free to pontificate ,ridicule or ever so subtlety insult . But it’s ok. He s a fans that sees every game . Warlocks
You post as you are doing. I don’t agree . That said,O don’t agree with myself all the time
I’m commented previously in this regard about groups etc. | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:16 - Sep 21 with 1879 views | KeithHaynes |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 13:27 - Sep 21 by ReslovenSwan1 |
This type of post is unfair. I would not go so far as to call it cowardly. Little slurs then you run away.
I cannot defend myself with moderator D telling me not to be confrontational.
There is no doubt Swansea were in for this boy. Brighton chose cash over his development.. |
You respond perfectly well. | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:21 - Sep 21 with 1865 views | onehunglow |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:16 - Sep 21 by KeithHaynes |
You respond perfectly well. |
He does indeed
He’s not used a pejorative on me anyway | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:33 - Sep 21 with 1848 views | RhonddaSwans |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 08:10 - Sep 21 by Whiterockin |
Good move by the club not to get involved with the numbers involved with the Rushworth loan. After what I felt was a shaky start Vigouroux has been excellent, plus he is our player. Back up, he was third choice and he won't be there after Christmas unless things change. |
Viggy has earned his no1 spot.
I got a feeling this carries on he will get a big move in the summer.
Burnley have let go hell of a keeper | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 01:24 - Sep 22 with 1538 views | KeithHaynes |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:33 - Sep 21 by RhonddaSwans |
Viggy has earned his no1 spot.
I got a feeling this carries on he will get a big move in the summer.
Burnley have let go hell of a keeper |
I have the feeling mate he will see what we are trying to do, and stay. | |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 07:55 - Sep 22 with 1456 views | blackpooljack |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 01:24 - Sep 22 by KeithHaynes |
I have the feeling mate he will see what we are trying to do, and stay. |
I find it odd that quiet a no. of posters on this forum think that most if our players can't wait to leave even tho they only signed a matter of weeks ago. |  | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 08:27 - Sep 22 with 1415 views | Whiterockin |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 07:55 - Sep 22 by blackpooljack |
I find it odd that quiet a no. of posters on this forum think that most if our players can't wait to leave even tho they only signed a matter of weeks ago. |
And most of the new signings are on 4 year contracts, if they go they won't be cheap. | | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 08:32 - Sep 22 with 1387 views | hobo |
Get him on the cheap next season |  | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 13:08 - Sep 22 with 1208 views | ReslovenSwan1 |
Broome was a strange signing. Barely had a kick last season. This season number 2 keeper then shunted down to 3 rd choice. Sti young but strange they could not trust him as no 2 keeper. Perhaps injury concerns? | |
| Wise sage since Toshack era |
| |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:55 - Sep 22 with 1112 views | QJumpingJack |
Luke certainly wanted Rushworth here for the 24/25 season.
I expect Watson, Coleman and Luke can explain what happened at the next fans forum which should be very soon. | | | |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 15:09 - Sep 22 with 1074 views | raynor94 |
| Rushworth not first choice at Hull on 14:55 - Sep 22 by QJumpingJack |
Luke certainly wanted Rushworth here for the 24/25 season.
I expect Watson, Coleman and Luke can explain what happened at the next fans forum which should be very soon. |
Hopefully they say, Brighton were messing about, and we are more than happy with Vig.
Whose looking an astute signing with every passing game |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
