| 3 at the back? 09:12 - Oct 2 with 1341 views | Hulahoop7 |
Mainly because we clearly lack a working back 4 at the moment, free up a place for more attacking talent. We should try to out score teams, as defending isnt our forte. What are ur views? |  | | |  |
| 3 at the back? on 09:15 - Oct 2 with 1335 views | WokingR |
What a fantastic idea - Make the gaps between our defenders even bigger |  | | |
| 3 at the back? on 09:22 - Oct 2 with 1327 views | Hulahoop7 |
| 3 at the back? on 09:15 - Oct 2 by WokingR |
What a fantastic idea - Make the gaps between our defenders even bigger |
It would require a new system for sure, and yes maybe not the best idea but 442 isn't working and we need to change things up. Not to mention most of our best players play in midfield, would be good to see them get a run out together, that's all I'm saying. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
