 | Forum
Reply | Cat 1. Academy Plans
at 15:05 14 Jan 2026
Does this present the possibility that the Youth team could go by other in the League Cup than the first team? It would be very QPR… |
| Forum
Reply | Cat 1. Academy Plans
at 11:56 14 Jan 2026
This feels like excellent news, and way better than being stuck in the relative no man’s land of Cat 2.
This has been a topic of discussion for about a decade. Can anyone remember why we didn’t push for Cat 1 before? It obviously involves more cost. Was Ruben not willing to stump it up before, but is now? Did Hoos not think it was a worthwhile investment before, but now does (or Nourry now does)?
Have they been waiting on something? Nourry’s audit of the club was 2-3 years ago, and the new training ground completed about 3 years ago (roughly). Why not do it then? I’m sure I read somewhere that the business case didn’t stack up, but I can’t remember where. Obviously Brentford have gone down completely the other path.
I think this is excellent news but there’s something I can’t remember properly making me think it’s not quite so black and white. |
| Forum
Reply | January transfer rumours
at 11:13 14 Jan 2026
Squad has DEFINITELY improved. But it should do if you spend £25m in 18 months, and only sell Charlie Kelman, Lyndon Dykes, and Sinclair Armstrong.
How do you keep that going though, whilst also retaining enough experience and professionalism in the squad, so it’s not a squad full of young gambles, to ensure the team maintains and improves on field results? Again, I would say your Fitness/Performance function is a key to that, but I’ve made that point.
My frustration is that I agreed with Nourry’s words back in May. It felt like a lesson learnt - we need some experience pros around with which to do the player trading so we have consistency and a few players laying standards down. But now those pros are up for sale…to enable more player trading.
Balance. I say it all the time. Not every player in the team/squad can be a signing to sell, a signing on potential, a signing who hasn’t done it at this level yet. You need to some meat and potatoes in there, that are reliable and experienced at this level, who you don’t sell, and age at the club, helping to bring on the high potential players. [Post edited 14 Jan 11:14]
|
| Forum
Reply | January transfer rumours
at 10:05 14 Jan 2026
So what you’re both saying is the squad building/management has been somewhat messy, and, because of all the money we have spent, we may need to sell some reliable, “good sort” bench players (starters in the recent past), with years of good service, on long term deals, for relatively little.
Wonderful. That sound strategic…
I refer people back to Nourry’s comments when he extended Field onto this massive deal last May.
He talked about how he’d secured the long term futures of the spine of the side now: JCS, Field, Chair, around which they could build with new, high potential signings, and young players. He then re-signed Dunne a month or two later. He spoke of their commitment to the project.
Now, actually, we need to sell some of them, because the bets placed on the £25m of new signings haven’t yet come off - in that we might not be able to sell any of them this summer, or not sell enough - so actually, some of that spine needs to be shifted too. And if you shift the likes of Field can’t replace with more U24s for risk of the team/squad becoming unbalanced. You do need some experience on the pitch. People who organise and do the donkey work off the ball.
I’m sorry. It’s not strategic. It’s flying by the seat of your pants stuff.
I absolutely get that things change in football and in business.
But just like the game model (all hot and heavy, and public about it, to ditching it, allowing the Head Coach to play his own system, and start referring to it as some broad concept in the ether), this is another major thing on the playing side where we’re completely pivoting from what the CEO/DOF himself said less than a year ago. Why? Because we need it to fund his rampant desire to play Football Manager in real life.
I’m sure people will think I’m being unfair. Perhaps I am. But it feels an awful lot like he’s making up the approach as he goes along. |
| Forum
Reply | January transfer rumours
at 09:23 14 Jan 2026
Where are those figures from?
I’d be very surprised if Field (and Dunne) aren’t on a lot more than £8k per week. Both have had recent long term contract extensions which will have come with salary rises. My guess is your 1.2m figure is half what it could be.
An experienced squad player on £8k a week would actually be decent value. But I get the point that someone on double that wouldn’t be.
What does this say about Isaac Hayden though? Potentially on similar money and 4-5 years older… Yet the club proactively signed him this season. Doesn’t seemed aligned or consistent as a strategy.
My issue is that I don’t think he should be a squad player. I think he should be starting, so I’d keep him.
But it’s clear they have been trying to force him out.
I don’t think there is a load of strategy or long term thinking at play with regards to who we sell.
We need to sell, given everything we have spent, some of our players won’t get any interest due to time left on their contract, age, form, injuries, so we’ll get what we can for the rest.
Dunne and Field are 28/27 and contracted for another 3.5 years most likely, so we have some leverage if there is interest. The issue, if there isn’t much interest, is we’ll have to give them away to get the salaries off the books, which is where the approach fails. |
| Forum
Reply | threadbare squad
at 15:08 13 Jan 2026
Excellent post.
I understand what Nix is saying with regards to context, in terms of football in general changing, and some other clubs having similar or worse situations than us.
However, I think the context you provide regards Williams’ stint at the Nets, coupled with our injury record and conditioning both last season and this (I’m focussing on the first team only here), does also provide relevant context on him.
Do we have the best “Performance” (Fitness, Medical, Physio) lead we could have? Are his methods actually working? Remember he was ex-cycling before coming to us. He’s implemented a method and approach from that sphere, so we are bucking the trend to gain an advantage. Are we though? Do his methods work? Brooklyn Nets appeared not to think so and dispensed with his services after one , injury hit, season.
As I have posted before, in a Player Trading strategy, where you’re amortising transfer fees to allow you to place more bets and sign more players up front, keeping those assets fit is absolutely critical. No one’s value goes up when they are injured. The model simply cannot allow us to have a middling to bad injury record in the first team AND be amortising such amounts (for a club of our income).
Given that, and given how we hold Head Coaches accountable, why would we not explore trying to replace him with someone better? On the evidence we have, it doesn’t seem like it’s likely we’d replace with someone who would produce worse results, so what does the club have to lose?
I understand Nourry and Williams are very close, but surely Nourry wouldn’t die in a ditch over Williams if his methods torpedo Nourry’s Player Trading model.
Replacing your Performance Lead shouldn’t be a big deal. |
| Forum
Reply | Kolli
at 22:21 11 Jan 2026
Really don’t think that is the case.
He’s widely considered a nice lad. And after the incident with you know who at the training ground several of the players consoled him when he was visibly upset. |
| Forum
Reply | Kolli
at 20:26 11 Jan 2026
Kolli stood out to me.
He had the touch and technical ability to make it in the Prem. Today was a big moment for him and the club. He showed he has it.
At 20, he is a serious asset for the club, especially in our player trading/amortisation model.
Regardless of whether Koki is here, we need to be playing Kolli week in week out.
He needs games, experience and nurturing.
If he played most of next season and picked up 10 goals and 5-6 assists, at 21, we’d be looking at 10-20m in the current market for him.
Lots of “ifs” there, but we have to try to make that happen. Egos need parking and pride swallowing for the good of the club. [Post edited 11 Jan 20:28]
|
| Forum
Reply | Fourth Round Here We Come Match Thread
at 13:43 11 Jan 2026
Field and Smyth would be in my best XI.
Struggle with the logic of picking Hayden over Field when the latter is under contract for 4 years on a high salary (coupled with everything he’s given the club over the last 3-4 seasons), whereas the former is on a short term deal and is about 5 years older…unless of course they are trying to freeze Field out. |
| Forum
Reply | Sell Jon Varane ?
at 12:54 10 Jan 2026
This is a bit of a straw man. Around me, Pu, there are quite a few who don’t rate Varane. Against Wednesday there were audible groans around the ground when he did his slow 4 touch 360 turn before laying it off backwards a couple of times. The Varane song also died a death when it was started up. It’s hardly a case he’s loved at the ground and hated on here. Some people, as is evidenced in this thread like him. And he has played some great games. But his form at the minute isn’t good. He doesn’t seem to be improving at all.
Equally, lots of astute posters on here really rate Kolli. Again, don’t think it’s the case at all that he gets bashed on here but loved in the ground. I think he’s pretty popular on here. Most want to see him given a run now Burrell is injured.
£5m is a great price for a central midfielder we paid c. £1m for 18 months ago, who isn’t showing any signs of improving this season. Field is better than Varane defensively, certainly tracks runners far better, and breaks up play better IMO. We also have Hayden who can play there. Selling won’t weaken the side and we need to sell to make this Player Trading/Amortisation model work. It is what it is. We’ll have to sell regularly. |
| Forum
Reply | RND - Whats occurring ??
at 19:59 9 Jan 2026
I think he’s much better than 6/10 most weeks. I also think he’s significantly better than Bidwell or Wallace or Paal. I really do. Best left back we have had for a very long time. Physically he’s meets the needs of modern football too.
The issues are a) his injury record, and b) at 26 he’ll have limited resale value.
Now, I’m a believer that you have to balance signings between the “will turn a profit” and “make today’s team better” camps. He certainly fits the latter.
All that said, I’d probably say £1m is fair deal.
Problem is, I suspect Utd will want him and play him. He was highly rated before he missed two seasons. He’s done well for us. I doubt they’d sell him on the cheap. |
| Forum
Reply | January transfer rumours
at 17:38 9 Jan 2026
Yep. Would bite your hand off for £5m (up front). Be mad not to sell. |
| Forum
Reply | January transfer rumours
at 13:47 9 Jan 2026
Well, indeed. If the only rumour is about someone being interested in him for less than we paid, it’s a non-starter, isn’t it? |
| Forum
Reply | January transfer rumours
at 13:42 9 Jan 2026
We paid more than 1.4m for him!
Fear there is going to be a big delta between what we want for him and what anyone else is willing to offer. |
| Forum
Reply | Burrel out until March
at 13:41 9 Jan 2026
He’s Head of Sporting Operations. He might be telling people he’s the DOF equivalent. But he’s not.
Have had it made very clear to me he is absolutely not what you would consider a typical DOF. Stephan does not report to him. He is not making the signings or even having much say on them.
It’s Head of Performance (Fitness/Medical), with all the logistical sh*t that goes around that (training ground, pitch, hotels, travel, diet, etc) bolted on.
Now, I could have been misled and he’s running the whole show on the football side with Nourry doing the CEO and Financial stuff. But I think it’s more than likely Williams is bigging himself up. We all know Nourry is the one leading on the Player Trading strategy, which is undoubtedly a big part of a DOF role. |
| Forum
Reply | Traitors UK thread **WILL CONTAIN SPOILERS**
at 22:42 8 Jan 2026
Yes, enjoyable how sure she was on who the traitors were (wrong on all 3 counts, and her best friend in the show was a traitor!), and how sure she was that she was helping everyone else (clearly not!). Pride before a fall and all that. She also got herself banished by talking too much about all her theories at the round table, which was a bit dumb.
I think the faithfuls should win this year. The explosion between Fiona and Rachel is sure to eventually result in both being voted out. And every time someone is recruited they tend to crumble. And Stephan’s crumbling already!
Reckon Faraaz wins. |
| Forum
Reply | Ronnie Edwards
at 19:20 8 Jan 2026
Yeah, that’s it. Point is, if you sell someone for less than you bought before their contact is up you have to offset some amortised fee against the fee you bring in.
It’s all manageable. It’s something lots of clubs does. And we’re clearly not as reckless as Chelsea (bigger fees, 8 yr contracts, etc) but our revenue is a lot lots lower too.
It’s workable and can work well so long as you sell a decent amount every year. That relies on Nourry’s bets (our signings for transfer fees) coming off more often than not. And we keep signing well. |
| Forum
Reply | Ronnie Edwards
at 18:11 8 Jan 2026
It doesn’t matter who, to an extent.
These numbers are all fag packet maths and I’m sure are a little out, but not materially.
It can be 6m of income from players sales from anyone. But fans need to remember when those sales happen, the money doesn’t allow 6m of spend on new players; it is just covering the historic amortised spend. If you want new players, you need to sell more.
However, there is one caveat, if we sell someone who bought for £Xm and amortised the transfer fee for, and we sell them for less than we paid, we will have to book as a cost the outstanding amount amortised. So, hypothetically, if Kone fails, and we sell him after 2 years for £2m (a £2m loss on the £4m paid) we’d have to bring forward the outstanding £2m amortised to that financial year. This means, in effect, we’d have sold him for nothing as far as that year’s P&L is concerned.
This brings into light another key point of the amortised approach. You absolutely must sell the players you pay transfer fees (and amortise said fees) for more than you paid. If you can’t, you basically end up holding onto them until the last few months of their contract when selling them
or paying them off won’t incur much outstanding amortisation brought forward. I’m pretty confident this is why Taylor Richards hung around for so long. We paid £2-3m for him, I believe, and I reckon we amortised that. And in those years we were tight to FFP, we simply couldn’t f*ck him off because on top of the salary owed, we’d have had to write off at that point whatever amount was left amortised over his contract term. It’s another downside of the approach.
But, look, the upside is nice things. It means for a couple of years you can spend beyond your means (to use family life parlance). But just like credit cards, at some point you need more money coming in to pay off what you owe. Here we don’t “owe” anything, but without sales we’ll have a big PSR problem and end up needing a firesale.
The whole thing relies on regular income from player sales, either not the ones amortised, or those ones for bigger amounts than you paid for them.
I think there is potential for big money sales in Kone, Edwards, Saito, perhaps Poku if he stays fit all of next season and tears it up. I’m just a little worried about this summer. And there is no guarantees the summer after who that big ticket sale is.
Again, I come back to it, it’s why having a tip top fitness/physio/medical/Performance teams is so critical. No one’s value goes up when they are injured… |
| | Hunterhoop
|
Site Scores| Prediction League: | 10 | | TOTAL: | 10 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.