 | Forum
Thread | Different charges for QPR and GP
at 22:46 29 Apr 2011
On the FA's website, I was surprised to see a charge actually against GP.
"The Club charges relate to the player Alejandro Faurlin and concern the alleged existence of an agreement between the Club and a third party in respect of the player’s economic rights, and the alleged failure by the Club to notify The FA of that agreement before the player was registered to play in England in July 2009.‬
‪These charges are brought under FA Rules C1(b)(iii) and E3, and the Third Party Investment in Players Regulations, A1 and A2.‬
‪The Club is also charged with allegedly using or seeking to pay an Unauthorised Agent in relation to the player’s registration in July 2009. This charge is brought under the Players Agents Regulations, A1.‬
‪The Club and Club Official Gianni Paladini are also charged in respect of allegedly false information contained in documents submitted to The FA in relation to the same player signing an extension to his playing contract with the Club in October 2010. These charges are brought under the Players Agents Regulations, C2, and FA Rule E3.‬
‪The FA will make no further comment at this time"
The first charge has been explained as confusion over dates of when it became against the rules...the second, the agent was FIFA redgistered but not FA registered...Could the third be GP working to his own ends? If so could QPR be found innocent or guilty (with strong mitigating factors) of a couple of minor offences and GP to blame (and punished) for the most serious? |
| | birchy
|
Site Scores| Forum Votes: | 0 | | Comment Votes: | 0 | | Prediction League: | 0 | | TOTAL: | 0 |
|
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.