Forum | 5 subs? by Sadoldgit

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread

5 subs? 15:55 - Aug 29 with 867 views

Having voted against it recently, apparently this is back on the agenda already. The big clubs want 5 subs but the smaller clubs feel that it will benefit the big clubs with deeper squads and voted against it before.

Thoughts?

Personally I think it is fine as it is but would bring in a rule that says no substitutes can be made in the last 5 minutes (apart from goalkeepers) to stop managers slowing the game down at the end.

[Post edited 29 Aug 2020 16:43]

5 subs? on 17:28 - Aug 29 with 818 views

Chesham_Saint

Unless it’s for blood then no way should it happen. It prejudicial to about 86 other clubs in the pyramid, so no.

Poll:

Which manager would you prefer Saints to have?

5 subs? on 21:32 - Aug 29 with 761 views

kingslandstand1

What's wrong with the current system

It's all part of the tactical nous of the manager for a start, not just making use of a massive squad to make sure he can keep his players happy by giving them a few minutes game time

5 subs? on 10:26 - Aug 30 with 679 views

KRAZYB

Having 5 subs would work but with one additional rule. Two must be for injured players during the game after the 3 subs have been used. Adding proviso that any such player injured and replaced is barred from next game.

Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread