| Taylor Richards 08:49 - Aug 6 with 2458 views | davman |
Ian McCullough / WLS quote Beale that he is a loan with "an obligation" to buy. So, even now we can't buy without selling, but we're already committing to buy something next year. I'm guessing that means we are now buying on "credit" and HAVE to sell to fund that.
Let's hope that this turns into a sellers market once more or we'll just end up selling a prize asset for the three packs of potatoes we had to a couple of years back just to get some money back or watching, forlornly as their contract winds down.
It worries me that with a club ethos full of the "right types" we continually get trod on. Teams still take the p out of S&P, we don't, we suffer. Teams still take the p and surround refs, we don't, we suffer. No-one seems to stand up for us around the big nasty boys and the big clubs. WHY are we still paying the ridiculously high fine for example? I hope to see some home shithousery this afternoon for a change.. |  |
| |  |
| Taylor Richards on 09:20 - Aug 6 with 2290 views | dmm |
It'll be interesting to see what the transfer fee for Richards is at the end of the season. Has one already been agreed or, if he does well with us, does the price increase? According to Transfer Market he moved from Man City to Brighton for just shy of £1m in 2019 but is now valued at £360k. |  | | |
| Taylor Richards on 10:16 - Aug 6 with 2151 views | DejR_vu |
I suspect it will be a lowish fee with a big sell-on percentage.
Man City probably take the view he’s more likely to develop better here if we have to buy him, develop him and sell him, than keeping him there or sending him out on ‘standard’ loans. |  |
| |
| Taylor Richards on 10:19 - Aug 6 with 2132 views | MedwayR |
| Taylor Richards on 10:16 - Aug 6 by DejR_vu |
I suspect it will be a lowish fee with a big sell-on percentage.
Man City probably take the view he’s more likely to develop better here if we have to buy him, develop him and sell him, than keeping him there or sending him out on ‘standard’ loans. |
I doubt Man City have an opinion, he’s on loan from Brighton! But your point remains.
His contract with Brighton expires in 2024 which must work in our favour. |  |
| |
| Taylor Richards on 10:27 - Aug 6 with 2107 views | DejR_vu |
| Taylor Richards on 10:19 - Aug 6 by MedwayR |
I doubt Man City have an opinion, he’s on loan from Brighton! But your point remains.
His contract with Brighton expires in 2024 which must work in our favour. |
Oops 🤦ðŸ»â€â™‚ï¸. I’m sure Man City are very maternal towards their old players 😬 | |
| |
| Taylor Richards on 10:53 - Aug 6 with 1986 views | DavieQPR |
Plus the fact he has only played 2 games for Brighton and this is his third loan spell. Seems unwanted. |  | | |
| Taylor Richards on 12:29 - Aug 6 with 1755 views | DWQPR |
They don’t need the cash anyway after fleecing £60million out of North Battersea for the hairy bloke at left back. Nice bit of business. | |
| |
| Taylor Richards on 20:20 - Aug 6 with 1128 views | NorthantsHoop |
| Taylor Richards on 12:29 - Aug 6 by DWQPR |
They don’t need the cash anyway after fleecing £60million out of North Battersea for the hairy bloke at left back. Nice bit of business. |
Now likely out for 2 months with an injury, can we send him back and loan someone else. Hopefully there is a clause in the agreement to send a player back to a host club if they pick up a long term injury. |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.