| Clive: Please check stats re our 'shots on target' v other team's goals 12:52 - Apr 8 with 1573 views | Jules4367 | Yep- I'm saying the same thing but only because I am so utterly annoyed. Match report can be summed up by (once again - AND PLEASE LOOK BACK AT THE PREVIOUS GAMES) - THE OPPOSING TEAM OFTEN SCORES MORE GOALS THAN WE HAVE SHOTS ON TARGETS !!!!!! Consistently this season our 'shots' and 'shots on target' have been abysmal and to call/ portray our players 'forwards', 'attackers', 'strikers' is almost fraudulent advertising - and how they can take money for not being able to do what they are paid for is almost tantamount 'fraud'. I posted before the game - Shooting Stats - that we would not have many. I am not a medium (actually XL!) but how did I know? If we cannot shoot we cannot score! If we cannot score, we cannot win! If we cannot win we cannot stay in the league! If we cannot score, we cannot take the pressure off the also "players" (and I use the term solely to separate them from the supporters) who call themselves defenders. If they had any decency, they would pay half of each weeks earnings to charity. If they are not made culpable - what do they care? A lot of them look like people who have handed in their notice and are leaving and do not really give 'two hoops ' about our team! |  | | |  |
| Clive: Please check stats re our 'shots on target' v other team's goals on 12:55 - Apr 8 with 1555 views | Hayesender | Do you not think the poor sod is depressed enough, without having to go through it all again! |  |
|  |
| Clive: Please check stats re our 'shots on target' v other team's goals on 18:05 - Apr 8 with 1370 views | baz_qpr | I think if you look at the XG stats which are online in many places we are bang on 3rd from bottom which is where we are if were not for readings deduction |  | |  |
| Clive: Please check stats re our 'shots on target' v other team's goals on 19:21 - Apr 8 with 1260 views | PlanetHonneywood |
| Clive: Please check stats re our 'shots on target' v other team's goals on 18:05 - Apr 8 by baz_qpr | I think if you look at the XG stats which are online in many places we are bang on 3rd from bottom which is where we are if were not for readings deduction |
Alternatively, tell the OP to do his own bloody research if it's that important to him! |  |
|  |
| |