| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? 16:11 - Nov 27 with 1973 views | FFC1 |
And a 3 day ban? It's reminiscent of Hangeland's tackle v Sunderland- not malicious but somewhat reckless and unnecessary from a normally sane and reliable figure. A brief ban might sober him up/rehabilitate him a bit.
I'm happy to take on board a yellow card myself if this is considered dissent. |  | | |  |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:15 - Nov 27 with 1947 views | finesse |
Should be banned until he produces a 3000 word obituary of Dave Sexton. |  | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:16 - Nov 27 with 1934 views | FFC1 |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:15 - Nov 27 by finesse |
Should be banned until he produces a 3000 word obituary of Dave Sexton. |
Without one mention of Chelsea | | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:20 - Nov 27 with 1912 views | W7Ranger |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:15 - Nov 27 by finesse |
Should be banned until he produces a 3000 word obituary of Dave Sexton. |
Of all the profile pics you could have, you have a pic of SWP........WHHHHYYYYYYYYY???? 
 |  | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:32 - Nov 27 with 1883 views | WokingR |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 16:16 - Nov 27 by FFC1 |
Without one mention of Chelsea |
And your Username is FFC1 !!!!?
I shouldn't be calling attention to bans if I was you |  | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 17:56 - Nov 27 with 1758 views | PinnerPaul |
Anyone who keeps repeating, like most commentators & press,that a "reckless" tackle is a red card offence should be red carded themselves!
Careless = No card
Reckless = Yellow
Excessive force and/or endangering the safety of an opponent = Red
No mention of "getting the ball" or "intent" in LOTG either btw!
Don't get me started!  | | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 17:59 - Nov 27 with 1751 views | FFC1 |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 17:56 - Nov 27 by PinnerPaul |
Anyone who keeps repeating, like most commentators & press,that a "reckless" tackle is a red card offence should be red carded themselves!
Careless = No card
Reckless = Yellow
Excessive force and/or endangering the safety of an opponent = Red
No mention of "getting the ball" or "intent" in LOTG either btw!
Don't get me started! |
Agree, but the 'excessive force' also encompasses 'reckless' does it not? He was reckless and in the ref's eyes went beyond that to 'excessive'. So to say reckless isn't wrong in itself, surely.
Woking, Loft for Words does not discriminate on the basis of personal preference | | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 18:04 - Nov 27 with 1741 views | PinnerPaul |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 17:59 - Nov 27 by FFC1 |
Agree, but the 'excessive force' also encompasses 'reckless' does it not? He was reckless and in the ref's eyes went beyond that to 'excessive'. So to say reckless isn't wrong in itself, surely.
Woking, Loft for Words does not discriminate on the basis of personal preference |
Well by that logic reckless is by definition also careless.
My point is we are taught to judge challenges using those criteria, so a reckless infringement without excessive force etc etc is a yellow. | | | |
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 18:34 - Nov 27 with 1684 views | TacticalR |
Let him off with a crucifixion. |  |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Anyone else think Kodika should receive a straight red for his recent post? on 18:38 - Nov 27 with 1669 views | BklynRanger |
Crucifixion's a doddle |  | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
