| Rival XI 14:11 - Mar 22 with 2065 views | MedwayR |
So in our boredom myself and a few mates are putting together our 'dream team' made entirely from players of our biggest rivals. So the Liverpool fan is doing a Man Utd XI, the Man Utd fan is doing a Liverpool XI and of course I'm doing a chelsea XI. The only rule is that they can't have played for your club which rules out the likes of Wilkins, Wilson etc. Ideally it'll contain players you'd have liked to have played for your club.
How would yours look?
GK: Cech
Def: Petrescu
Def: Desailly
Def: Bogarde (just for shafting them by sitting on his fat contract!)
Def: Azpilicueta
Mid: Poyet
Mid: Gullit
Mid: Lampard
Mid: Mata
For: Zola
For: Vialli [Post edited 22 Mar 2020 14:12]
|  |
| |  |
| Rival XI on 14:21 - Mar 22 with 2042 views | enfieldargh |
I feel unwell |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 14:24 - Mar 22 with 2039 views | kensalriser |
This is like deliberately shitting on the floor in your own house. |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 14:28 - Mar 22 with 2030 views | enfieldargh |
ok I'll play
1. whoever was in goal for the 6-0 thrashing
2. John Hollins
3. Gary Chivers
4 Gavin Peacock
5 Steve Wicks
6 Dave Webb
7 John Spencer
8 Ray Wilkins
9 Tommy Langley
10 Clive Walker
11Nigel Spackman | |
| |
| Rival XI on 14:38 - Mar 22 with 2010 views | MedwayR |
| Rival XI on 14:28 - Mar 22 by enfieldargh |
ok I'll play
1. whoever was in goal for the 6-0 thrashing
2. John Hollins
3. Gary Chivers
4 Gavin Peacock
5 Steve Wicks
6 Dave Webb
7 John Spencer
8 Ray Wilkins
9 Tommy Langley
10 Clive Walker
11Nigel Spackman |
They can't have played for QPR. | |
| |
| Rival XI on 15:03 - Mar 22 with 1984 views | enfieldargh |
| Rival XI on 14:38 - Mar 22 by MedwayR |
They can't have played for QPR. |
I feel unwell again | |
| |
| Rival XI on 15:45 - Mar 22 with 1956 views | Hayesender |
| Rival XI on 14:28 - Mar 22 by enfieldargh |
ok I'll play
1. whoever was in goal for the 6-0 thrashing
2. John Hollins
3. Gary Chivers
4 Gavin Peacock
5 Steve Wicks
6 Dave Webb
7 John Spencer
8 Ray Wilkins
9 Tommy Langley
10 Clive Walker
11Nigel Spackman |
Steve Francis? |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 16:39 - Mar 22 with 1926 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Oh God, no.... |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 19:26 - Mar 22 with 1820 views | Stanisgod |
I can't even think of one |  |
| It's being so happy that keeps me going. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Rival XI on 19:39 - Mar 22 with 1807 views | OakR |
No players. Just one member of staff - the physio doctor who annoyed Mourinho - she deserves a mention. No players, ever. |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 19:53 - Mar 26 with 1599 views | LazyFan |
| Rival XI on 19:39 - Mar 22 by OakR |
No players. Just one member of staff - the physio doctor who annoyed Mourinho - she deserves a mention. No players, ever. |
What about Danny Drinkwater.
Cost £35 million and played only 12 games so, just under £3m per game.
Whist also keeping Loftus Cheek out of the team so, that when he did get in the team he was then injured.
It's these sort of buys that we want Chelscum to do more of in the future.
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 00:58 - Mar 28 with 1475 views | PlanetHonneywood |
1. Cerny
2. Wilson
3. Walker
4. Ruddock
5. Fenwick
6. Ardiles
7. Venables
8. Sinton
9. Allen
10. Taarabt
11. Ferdinand
Subs.
13. Hall
14. Jenas
15. Kerslake
16. Zamora
17. Crouch
18. Caulker
19. Kranjcar
Mgr. Francis |  |
| |
| Rival XI on 06:22 - Mar 28 with 1444 views | SydneyRs |
| Rival XI on 15:45 - Mar 22 by Hayesender |
Steve Francis? |
It was indeed Steve Francis.
From his wikipedia: "Francis signed as an apprentice for Chelsea in July 1980,and made his debut as a 17-year-old at Southampton in the League Cup in October 1981,and made his League debut in November 1981.[3] Francis was initially a regular in the side, but the arrival of new goalkeeper Eddie Niedzwiecki in 1983 saw him relegated to the reserves for most of the next three seasons. Francis returned to the first team after an injury to Niedzwiecki, but conceded 14 goals in three games over Easter 1986 and never played for the club again."
So his memories of us are unlikely to be fond. [Post edited 28 Mar 2020 6:24]
| | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
