By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions. We in turn value your personal details in accordance with our Privacy Policy.
Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Looks like maybe Burrell back in a few weeks, unlikely Chair and Madsen, though not sure I would risk playing Burrell so close to the end of the season, or only for limited time if needed. Let's have them all fit for the start of next season.
“I would say that within two weeks, maybe two weeks, maybe three,” Williams told reporters at LOFTUS on Tuesday. “We’ll only speak to you when we have to because there’s no reason for us to do this.”
Williams indicated that it was possible that some of your favorite players could still play another game but said an agreement with fans was not necessary for further communications.
He added that Cook would leave when he was not able to force a new contract and claimed the regime now in power was better than the leadership before.
“We have had regime change now. Regime change was not one of the things I had in terms of scoring more goals. I had one goal - back to the stoning age.’
Is this Regime Change bloke any good? Will he be available for the play offs?
[Post edited 1 Apr 12:13]
"Remember to listen to me but look at her. Don't get it the wrong way round. That would be hideous."
We've asked and it's bone bruising, which is a weird thing because you can be out for three weeks or three months with it.
Why they didn't/couldn't/wouldn't say that is just part of this ongoing ridiculous attitude towards communicating with us. They would seemingly rather rumours fly around about a young player new to the club than just come out and say exactly what I've said there - it's bone bruising, it's a funny injury to put a time frame on.
The paranoia and obsession with confidentiality is nuts to me.
Has the "confidentiality" actually benefited the club in terms of league performance, bargaining position, or indeed anything? If not, then what is the argument for doing it?
Has the "confidentiality" actually benefited the club in terms of league performance, bargaining position, or indeed anything? If not, then what is the argument for doing it?
I can't believe it's really helped with anything - I mean fine if you are saying someone is fit for one game 24 hours before and they are not, or vice-versa to keep the opposition guessing, but long-term injuries can't be much benefit. Most other things will come out in medicals I assume so strange.
It's not like you can hide how long someone has been out to prospective buyers. It's pretty odd.
Has the "confidentiality" actually benefited the club in terms of league performance, bargaining position, or indeed anything? If not, then what is the argument for doing it?
Harder to be held accountable if everything is confidential. Less scrutiny. Easier to manipulate the narrative.
7 games, 4 at home. Maybe use Chair, Madsen and Burrell for a couple of those off the bench. Otherwise don't bother. Keep Morgan and Kolli playing for development and make sure we are in a position to have a proper pre season
According to Stephan on the WLS podcast, Obikwu is still not training with the group, so I wonder if we'll see him before last couple of games. Sounds about as far away as Madsen and Chair, maybe further.
Burrell nearest, sounds like he could be back for Millwall. "Very good improvement...perhaps after Bristol."
Couple of minutes in. Dave makes a good point later in relation to Chair about how Furlong went through a bad few years with recurring injuries but ended up playing through the leagues into his 40s once he'd broken the pattern. Chair has time.
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.