| Big Sam to sue the FA 11:45 - Oct 4 with 2751 views | paulparker |
Hopefully Sampson follows suit and rinses these useless plums for all their worth
Martin Glenn is an absolute helmet ,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4945798/Sam-Allardyce-sue-FA-E |  |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |  |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 12:31 - Oct 4 with 2665 views | BrianMcCarthy |
I thought his behaviour gave them no option. The man has no shame.
My only worry is that he'll rock up at Rangers or Ireland one day. |  |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 13:01 - Oct 4 with 2597 views | makaveli1882 |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 12:31 - Oct 4 by BrianMcCarthy |
I thought his behaviour gave them no option. The man has no shame.
My only worry is that he'll rock up at Rangers or Ireland one day. |
He is a deplorable sub human, Having been in the England travel group for over 10 years, I decided not to renew when he was in charge ....for the one game.
Oh how I laughed when he was sacked for doing what Fat Sam does and being what Fat Sam is - a pub footballer, anti football lying scumbag.
If he was manager for Rangers I wouldn't watch one kick off his football even if we was in the champions league final against Chelsea in the Maracana!
Bitter bitter man who wants yet another pay out fcek off |  | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 13:23 - Oct 4 with 2548 views | jonno |
Is this the same Sam Allardyce who was caught bang to rights taking bungs on Panorama but which the FA chose to do nothing about? |  | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 13:35 - Oct 4 with 2520 views | kensalriser |
Just because the FA is mostly a bunch of trough-swilling incompetents doesn't mean that Sampson isn't a bad sort. He has no case and even he did, he's not going to risk all the activities that got him the sack being put under the spotlight.
Would you be as supportive of him if it had been your daughter he was shagging pp?
As for Sam, well, for me he makes Harry Redknapp seem a lovely, honest kind of chap. |  |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 14:31 - Oct 4 with 2414 views | paulparker |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 13:35 - Oct 4 by kensalriser |
Just because the FA is mostly a bunch of trough-swilling incompetents doesn't mean that Sampson isn't a bad sort. He has no case and even he did, he's not going to risk all the activities that got him the sack being put under the spotlight.
Would you be as supportive of him if it had been your daughter he was shagging pp?
As for Sam, well, for me he makes Harry Redknapp seem a lovely, honest kind of chap. |
you know as well as me that Sampson was going to get the sack no matter what it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol
so he sha gged someone over 18 I don't see the problem , footballers from the days of Stanley Matthews have been either knobbing the chairmen's daughter/wife , admin clerks , assistants, pa girls, masseurs even their team mates wife's and partners
sven the biggest shagger at the FA even slept with the FA secretary and it didn't matter
I fail to see what Sampson has done wrong or anything different to what current and past footballers get up to , you had already determined him to be a wrong un and you wanted him gone over the alleged comments to Alokou (sp) something he was cleared of not once but twice
if it was my daughter and she was over 18 what could I say or do I wouldn't be happy obviously but she is a grown woman now if she was under age then that's a different matter | |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 17:46 - Oct 4 with 2285 views | johncharles |
No mattrer what your opinion is of Allardarse (and mine is pretty low)' he was fitted up by the press. A clear case of entrapment. The FA should have backed him partly because he was their man and partly because they left themselves open to being sued. I'm with PP on this one.
And the Sampson case. The FA are spineless. You can't sack someone just because the press hounds them. A lot of good people have gone down this way. We might not like Fat Sam and Sampson (sounds like a band  ) but they have been unfairly dismissed. |  |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 18:12 - Oct 4 with 2237 views | johncharles |
It's not actually illegal to be a low life maggot. It's not a even a sackable offence. | |
| Strong and stable my arse. |
| |
Login to get fewer ads
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 21:51 - Oct 4 with 2100 views | QPR_Jim |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 14:31 - Oct 4 by paulparker |
you know as well as me that Sampson was going to get the sack no matter what it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol
so he sha gged someone over 18 I don't see the problem , footballers from the days of Stanley Matthews have been either knobbing the chairmen's daughter/wife , admin clerks , assistants, pa girls, masseurs even their team mates wife's and partners
sven the biggest shagger at the FA even slept with the FA secretary and it didn't matter
I fail to see what Sampson has done wrong or anything different to what current and past footballers get up to , you had already determined him to be a wrong un and you wanted him gone over the alleged comments to Alokou (sp) something he was cleared of not once but twice
if it was my daughter and she was over 18 what could I say or do I wouldn't be happy obviously but she is a grown woman now if she was under age then that's a different matter |
To continue your hypothetical situation, what if your daughter had been coached from say 16 or 17 before he sha gged her at 18? |  | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 07:57 - Oct 5 with 1930 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 18:12 - Oct 4 by johncharles |
It's not actually illegal to be a low life maggot. It's not a even a sackable offence. |
True, and I get your point. But he was advising strangers how to get around his own employers' rules on third-party ownership. They couldn't leave one of their top employees in the job after that and expect everyone else to comply. They simply couldn't.
The rest of the stuff is noxious, but not - as you rightly say - sackable. | |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:09 - Oct 5 with 1924 views | paulparker |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 07:57 - Oct 5 by BrianMcCarthy |
True, and I get your point. But he was advising strangers how to get around his own employers' rules on third-party ownership. They couldn't leave one of their top employees in the job after that and expect everyone else to comply. They simply couldn't.
The rest of the stuff is noxious, but not - as you rightly say - sackable. |
He called Roy Hodgson useless. (correct) Said the Prince of wherever is lazy (probably correct ) and that the FA were amateurs.(definitely correct) He then went on to mention that he couldn't say how you were able to circumvent the rules on player transfer (but lets face it all managers must know the loop holes on 3rd part ownership)
That's what they broadcast. It must have been their best, headline grabbing stuff. Some case against the defendant that is your honour.
im no fan of fat sam , but he didn't do anything to be sacked for. And that's before you factor in that the main man behind his removal was the ridiculous Gregg Clarke. An FA man if ever there was one. A babbling fool of inane clichés. | |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:16 - Oct 5 with 1914 views | paulparker |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 21:51 - Oct 4 by QPR_Jim |
To continue your hypothetical situation, what if your daughter had been coached from say 16 or 17 before he sha gged her at 18? |
I wouldn't be happy of course but I don't think any father would want to think of their daughters being intimate or having boyfriends that's a natural fatherly thing
My dad met my mum when he was 19 and she was 16 and they married 5 years later
should my dad have lost his job ?
as long as Sampson wasn't fiddling with girls under 17 then he hasn't done anything wrong and even if the FA thought he had why did they give him the biggest job in women's football ? we know why he was sacked it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol so I hope for one Sampson clears his name and sues the FA for everything they have | |
| And Bowles is onside, Swinburne has come rushing out of his goal , what can Bowles do here , onto the left foot no, on to the right foot
That’s there that’s two, and that’s Bowles
Brian Moore
|
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:26 - Oct 5 with 1902 views | BrianMcCarthy |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:09 - Oct 5 by paulparker |
He called Roy Hodgson useless. (correct) Said the Prince of wherever is lazy (probably correct ) and that the FA were amateurs.(definitely correct) He then went on to mention that he couldn't say how you were able to circumvent the rules on player transfer (but lets face it all managers must know the loop holes on 3rd part ownership)
That's what they broadcast. It must have been their best, headline grabbing stuff. Some case against the defendant that is your honour.
im no fan of fat sam , but he didn't do anything to be sacked for. And that's before you factor in that the main man behind his removal was the ridiculous Gregg Clarke. An FA man if ever there was one. A babbling fool of inane clichés. |
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/09/26/exclusive-how-sam-allardyce-tried-to-
I think the first thirty seconds of that are sackable.
If we differ, no problem PP. | |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:44 - Oct 5 with 1877 views | loftboy |
My fist long term relationship I was 19 she was 17 (just) making me an adult and her a child, was I wrong then? |  |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 09:43 - Oct 5 with 1839 views | smegma |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 14:31 - Oct 4 by paulparker |
you know as well as me that Sampson was going to get the sack no matter what it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol
so he sha gged someone over 18 I don't see the problem , footballers from the days of Stanley Matthews have been either knobbing the chairmen's daughter/wife , admin clerks , assistants, pa girls, masseurs even their team mates wife's and partners
sven the biggest shagger at the FA even slept with the FA secretary and it didn't matter
I fail to see what Sampson has done wrong or anything different to what current and past footballers get up to , you had already determined him to be a wrong un and you wanted him gone over the alleged comments to Alokou (sp) something he was cleared of not once but twice
if it was my daughter and she was over 18 what could I say or do I wouldn't be happy obviously but she is a grown woman now if she was under age then that's a different matter |
Erm, I believe it was in his contract. He broke the terms of his contract. | | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 09:58 - Oct 5 with 1828 views | isawqpratwcity |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:44 - Oct 5 by loftboy |
My fist long term relationship I was 19 she was 17 (just) making me an adult and her a child, was I wrong then? |
Er, Loftboy, I'm guessing "My fist long term relationship" is a typo? |  |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 10:57 - Oct 5 with 1794 views | danehoop |
Two thoughts-
It’s a report in the daily fail, so usually quite a gap between opinion and fact in whatever they publish.
Fat Sam has often had a problem converting threats to sue into actual legal action. |  |
| Never knowingly understood |
| |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 11:01 - Oct 5 with 1788 views | robith |
I take it the people standing up for him don't work at places with reputational risk rules |  | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 12:14 - Oct 5 with 1746 views | LunarJetman |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:16 - Oct 5 by paulparker |
I wouldn't be happy of course but I don't think any father would want to think of their daughters being intimate or having boyfriends that's a natural fatherly thing
My dad met my mum when he was 19 and she was 16 and they married 5 years later
should my dad have lost his job ?
as long as Sampson wasn't fiddling with girls under 17 then he hasn't done anything wrong and even if the FA thought he had why did they give him the biggest job in women's football ? we know why he was sacked it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol so I hope for one Sampson clears his name and sues the FA for everything they have |
I guess it depends whether your dad had anything in his contract to prevent him nobbing 16 year olds or not.... |  | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 12:48 - Oct 5 with 1706 views | DeepcutHoop |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:16 - Oct 5 by paulparker |
I wouldn't be happy of course but I don't think any father would want to think of their daughters being intimate or having boyfriends that's a natural fatherly thing
My dad met my mum when he was 19 and she was 16 and they married 5 years later
should my dad have lost his job ?
as long as Sampson wasn't fiddling with girls under 17 then he hasn't done anything wrong and even if the FA thought he had why did they give him the biggest job in women's football ? we know why he was sacked it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol so I hope for one Sampson clears his name and sues the FA for everything they have |
Grooming them until their old enough from a position of authority with a duty of care over the child?
That's a solid nope from me, scummy behaviour. | | | |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 13:55 - Oct 5 with 1672 views | QPR_Jim |
| Big Sam to sue the FA on 08:16 - Oct 5 by paulparker |
I wouldn't be happy of course but I don't think any father would want to think of their daughters being intimate or having boyfriends that's a natural fatherly thing
My dad met my mum when he was 19 and she was 16 and they married 5 years later
should my dad have lost his job ?
as long as Sampson wasn't fiddling with girls under 17 then he hasn't done anything wrong and even if the FA thought he had why did they give him the biggest job in women's football ? we know why he was sacked it had nothing to do with what happened at Bristol so I hope for one Sampson clears his name and sues the FA for everything they have |
The difference between your dad and Sampson would be that he wasn't in a position to have a duty of care over your mum, also Sampson was 26 when he was at Bristol so that's a bit more of an age difference than your example, same points apply to Loftboy. It's akin to a teacher sleeping with a student and should be treated as such.
I don't know what happened, as I guess none of us do, but I'm not going to question the judgement of those in possession of all the facts. The example I used was grooming underage girls but maybe it wasn't even an age issue, perhaps he implied to certain girls that their chances of a start would be improved if they slept with him, would that be OK? of course not. So while we don't know the facts I fail to see how you or anyone else can defend him because you may be defending someone who's done something we all agree is unacceptable. | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
