| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. 10:51 - Jan 19 with 3213 views | Speediesdouble |
..is that payback I can sniff in the air. Maybe this time we won't have a three man disadvantage for most of the game ?!! ;-)
Joking aside should be a cracker and my bet for the best behaved players on the pitch will be on Ferdinand and Terry who I expect to shake hands and act as if the whole situation didn't exist. |  | | |  |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 10:54 - Jan 19 with 2311 views | adhoc_qpr |
"Maybe this time we won't have a three man disadvantage for most of the game ?!!"
Depends if AVB has taught your players to tackle properly yet -judging by Lampard's effort against Wolves i'd say he hasn't!
| | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 10:54 - Jan 19 with 2311 views | adhoc_qpr |
"Maybe this time we won't have a three man disadvantage for most of the game ?!!"
Depends if AVB has taught your players to tackle properly yet -judging by Lampard's effort against Wolves i'd say he hasn't!
| | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 10:55 - Jan 19 with 2310 views | spencer |
Hi,.... not being funny....couldn't really give a monkeys ars. about the FA Cup 4th round.We have far more important issues...survival is our main issue at moment.
We will take our 1-0 fortunate win and keep that in our wallets for future reference. |  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:00 - Jan 19 with 2268 views | Speediesdouble |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 10:54 - Jan 19 by adhoc_qpr |
"Maybe this time we won't have a three man disadvantage for most of the game ?!!"
Depends if AVB has taught your players to tackle properly yet -judging by Lampard's effort against Wolves i'd say he hasn't!
|
Agreed that will be one factor the other is having a competent referee. | | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:03 - Jan 19 with 2241 views | Jeff |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:00 - Jan 19 by Speediesdouble |
Agreed that will be one factor the other is having a competent referee. |
You thought that he should have sent off Cole as well then? |  |
| |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:05 - Jan 19 with 2236 views | qprdan |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:00 - Jan 19 by Speediesdouble |
Agreed that will be one factor the other is having a competent referee. |
Goals scored is the main one though, please play Side show bob, he is funny!! |  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:08 - Jan 19 with 2210 views | kropotkin41 |
It's a bit unfortunate I think that we have Chelsea, mainly because I'd like to not care too much about the FA Cup and I'd prefer not to see anyone injured.
Unlikely that we'll beat them again I'd say, unless MH weaves some real magic over the next few weeks.
It would be nice to see the game played in a good spirit and to see some nice football by both teams. |  |
| ‘morbid curiosity about where this is all going’ |
| |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:10 - Jan 19 with 2197 views | Speediesdouble |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:05 - Jan 19 by qprdan |
Goals scored is the main one though, please play Side show bob, he is funny!! |
Who knows, mind you if you play like you did against MK the whole cast of the simpsons could play for us and i would still fancy our chances. | | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:11 - Jan 19 with 2188 views | daveB |
If we don't add some quality I think Chelsea will win comfortbaly by 3 or 4 goals, especially with our new straight line tactics that makes us easier to break down. Best I am hoping for is to score first again and make a real game of it. It's the last game either side wanted really though as we both have bigger fish to fry. |  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:12 - Jan 19 with 2182 views | Speediesdouble |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:08 - Jan 19 by kropotkin41 |
It's a bit unfortunate I think that we have Chelsea, mainly because I'd like to not care too much about the FA Cup and I'd prefer not to see anyone injured.
Unlikely that we'll beat them again I'd say, unless MH weaves some real magic over the next few weeks.
It would be nice to see the game played in a good spirit and to see some nice football by both teams. |
I think it will be a "competitive" game but I'm almost certain that regardless it will be played in good spirit. | | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:19 - Jan 19 with 2135 views | Northernr |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:12 - Jan 19 by Speediesdouble |
I think it will be a "competitive" game but I'm almost certain that regardless it will be played in good spirit. |
Not a chance. This is going to be nasty unfortunately. |  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:27 - Jan 19 with 2089 views | Speediesdouble |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:19 - Jan 19 by Northernr |
Not a chance. This is going to be nasty unfortunately. |
I think both teams will be read the riot act before the game and though as I said I believe it will be feisty, I don't think there will be much in the way of verbals or crowding the ref etc.....I could be wrong though. | | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:30 - Jan 19 with 2071 views | spencer |
You will probably win, as you have suggested.....but still you will have a racist thug as your captain...I would rather watch QPR all day get mined by the MK Dons than actually have to watch one more Chelsea game with that racist thug in charge on the pitch.Are you happy about this considering the majority of your team is black?Or is this not an issue for you... | | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:31 - Jan 19 with 2066 views | loftboy |
Chris Foy should of sent off more ATAF Don't blame the ref for your own lack of discipline |  |
| |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:32 - Jan 19 with 2061 views | Juzzie |
Was I the only one who was gutted when Chelsea got pulled out of the hat?!
I hope I'm wrong but I think we'll get easily beaten which means the result in October will be overshadowed.
|  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:40 - Jan 19 with 2029 views | Juzzie |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:31 - Jan 19 by loftboy |
Chris Foy should of sent off more ATAF Don't blame the ref for your own lack of discipline |
Indeed!
Penatly? Yes
1st sending off 50/50, can understand why it was given as if Terry had been closer I think it would have been a yellow
2nd sending off 100% nailed on
Cole should have been a third tro walk for a 2nd yello right on full time
We had two bookings, I think Chelsea had seven.
| | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:43 - Jan 19 with 2015 views | Ferdy |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:32 - Jan 19 by Juzzie |
Was I the only one who was gutted when Chelsea got pulled out of the hat?!
I hope I'm wrong but I think we'll get easily beaten which means the result in October will be overshadowed.
|
I wasn't too happy either. Chances are that we will get beat, potentially quite heavily, we used up quite a bit of luck in the win in October we haven't had any since.
Id much rather a win on saturday than against the dirty scummers up the road. |  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:46 - Jan 19 with 2002 views | adhoc_qpr |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:40 - Jan 19 by Juzzie |
Indeed!
Penatly? Yes
1st sending off 50/50, can understand why it was given as if Terry had been closer I think it would have been a yellow
2nd sending off 100% nailed on
Cole should have been a third tro walk for a 2nd yello right on full time
We had two bookings, I think Chelsea had seven.
|
I think the reason Chelsea fans are confused about the HH penalty decision is that they never get given by refs at Stamford Bridge!
See the nailed on penalty not given to Sunderland last weekend when Cashley knocked Bendtner over in the area. | | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:55 - Jan 19 with 1976 views | Speediesdouble |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:30 - Jan 19 by spencer |
You will probably win, as you have suggested.....but still you will have a racist thug as your captain...I would rather watch QPR all day get mined by the MK Dons than actually have to watch one more Chelsea game with that racist thug in charge on the pitch.Are you happy about this considering the majority of your team is black?Or is this not an issue for you... |
What's the view like from up there on your high horse ? You watch Sean Derry don't you ?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-1221312/Crystal-Palace-hit-Car
I particularly liked Warnocks "It's all hot air" comment, classic.
As for Barton where do you begin...
| | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:58 - Jan 19 with 1953 views | adhoc_qpr |
To be fair, i think Barton is an equal opportunities abuser - he will insult or assault people regardless of creed or colour... | | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:59 - Jan 19 with 1949 views | toboboly |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:46 - Jan 19 by adhoc_qpr |
I think the reason Chelsea fans are confused about the HH penalty decision is that they never get given by refs at Stamford Bridge!
See the nailed on penalty not given to Sunderland last weekend when Cashley knocked Bendtner over in the area. |
Villa's penalty at Loftus Road was soft. The HH one was stupidity on Luiz's part. |  |
| Sexy Asian dwarves wanted. |
| |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 12:08 - Jan 19 with 1920 views | TW_R |
"Maybe this time we won't have a three man disadvantage for most of the game ?!! ;-)"
I think that's a bit unfair - Luiz played OK in the 2nd half.
|  | | |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 12:13 - Jan 19 with 1899 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Oh, God! The Surrey Mob are back... |  |
| |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 12:14 - Jan 19 with 1892 views | Stanisgod |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 11:00 - Jan 19 by Speediesdouble |
Agreed that will be one factor the other is having a competent referee. |
Funny how they don't mention all the times they get things go their way , ain't it. As mentioned Lampard v Wolves, no whinging about that incompetant ref.  |  |
| It's being so happy that keeps me going. |
| |
| Who'd have though we would be back so soon.. on 12:19 - Jan 19 with 1862 views | hoopstilidie |
Yep who can forget Derry`s lengthy ban and court case for that incident?
Oh hang on! |  |
| |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.