| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 20:40 - Oct 2 with 4022 views | Noelmc |
Thanks Clive.
Fantastic report. I hope you enjoyed writing it as much as I did reading it.
Sounds like a great day out for the R's faithful. |  | |  |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 20:43 - Oct 2 with 3998 views | hantssi |
Great report as usual Clive.
City fans see us a bit differently though, this is from the BBC match comments, and I quote;
“ QPR full of lumps with pace but no skill.
Neither will get close to the top.” |  | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 23:44 - Oct 2 with 3390 views | E17hoop |
Paal was_apparently_3 yards offside for the goal.
Or not...
 |  |
| |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 09:19 - Oct 3 with 2871 views | Phildo |
can we do a gofundme to buy you a phone case? |  | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 09:24 - Oct 3 with 2860 views | SydneyRs |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 20:43 - Oct 2 by hantssi |
Great report as usual Clive.
City fans see us a bit differently though, this is from the BBC match comments, and I quote;
“ QPR full of lumps with pace but no skill.
Neither will get close to the top.” |
Absolutely typical losing fan comments, along with "worst team we've played all season" etc. | | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 12:24 - Oct 3 with 2478 views | Ghost_on_the_Westway |
“busier than a two-twa**ted hooker” - I’m nicking that one!
It’s time to retire “… than a one-armed juggler with crabs” anyway.
A great read, thanks Clive. |  |
| I need a SAGA. What’s the SAGA? It’s ….. Queen’s Park Rangers. |
| |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 13:26 - Oct 3 with 2359 views | Noelmc |
I hope all the R's fans collecting on the 'emotional insurance' Nahki Wells to score bets, had a wide smile as it was heading for a throw in when it deflected off Balogun. How that was credited to him, I will never know! | | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 13:42 - Oct 3 with 2331 views | Northernr |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 13:26 - Oct 3 by Noelmc |
I hope all the R's fans collecting on the 'emotional insurance' Nahki Wells to score bets, had a wide smile as it was heading for a throw in when it deflected off Balogun. How that was credited to him, I will never know! |
That'll surely go down as an OG when it's looked at properly. |  | | |
Login to get fewer ads
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 13:50 - Oct 3 with 2298 views | BathRanger |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 23:44 - Oct 2 by E17hoop |
Paal was_apparently_3 yards offside for the goal.
Or not...
|
Anyone got a similar picture of the goal which was ruled out for offside? Hearing it wasn't offside and should have stood but haven't seen a picture of it and it wasn't included on the highlights |  | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 14:54 - Oct 3 with 2181 views | nix |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 13:50 - Oct 3 by BathRanger |
Anyone got a similar picture of the goal which was ruled out for offside? Hearing it wasn't offside and should have stood but haven't seen a picture of it and it wasn't included on the highlights |
The full 90 minutes now up. There's a replay around 44/45 minutes where it looks like he's marginally off. Maybe his knee is ahead of the defender. |  | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 15:43 - Oct 3 with 2060 views | Antti_Heinola |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 13:50 - Oct 3 by BathRanger |
Anyone got a similar picture of the goal which was ruled out for offside? Hearing it wasn't offside and should have stood but haven't seen a picture of it and it wasn't included on the highlights |
is it worth saying that that photo doesn't prove anything? It's awful. Bloke in the middle could easily be playing him on. |  |
| |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 16:15 - Oct 3 with 1984 views | PinnerPaul |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 15:43 - Oct 3 by Antti_Heinola |
is it worth saying that that photo doesn't prove anything? It's awful. Bloke in the middle could easily be playing him on. |
AND my old complaint about VAR - look at the ball - wind that back/forward a frame or two and it will still look like the moment the pass was made, although of Paal and the defender(s) positions will change.
Anything that tight should always be called ONside in my view, with VAR.
Without VAR its just human opinion/judgement, which I STILL prefer. | | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 16:33 - Oct 3 with 1958 views | Northernr |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 16:15 - Oct 3 by PinnerPaul |
AND my old complaint about VAR - look at the ball - wind that back/forward a frame or two and it will still look like the moment the pass was made, although of Paal and the defender(s) positions will change.
Anything that tight should always be called ONside in my view, with VAR.
Without VAR its just human opinion/judgement, which I STILL prefer. |
This was the thing TV pundits never acknowledged during their "one replay would have sorted all this out" pre-VAR rhetoric. Not only does the referee you're slagging off only get one look at it, and can't freeze frame, but even when you do freeze-frame it and look at it from every angle you'd often still get one pundit who said it was on and one who said it was off. | | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 08:46 - Oct 4 with 1324 views | Esox_Lucius |
Great read as usual Clive, always puts a smile on face irrespective of the result. One for the statisticians on here perhaps, what is our away following as a percentage of our home support? We are very well attended away despite only having our manager and new players since June? I saw yesterday that Beale is the 11th longest serving Championship manager now  Cheers Watford. |  |
| The grass is always greener. |
| |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 11:16 - Oct 4 with 1190 views | PinnerPaul |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 16:33 - Oct 3 by Northernr |
This was the thing TV pundits never acknowledged during their "one replay would have sorted all this out" pre-VAR rhetoric. Not only does the referee you're slagging off only get one look at it, and can't freeze frame, but even when you do freeze-frame it and look at it from every angle you'd often still get one pundit who said it was on and one who said it was off. |
The guy who annoys me more than anyone with this change of 'stance' is Gary Linekar.
He was saying exactly that pre VAR, he even did a 'puff piece' sycophantic interview with FIFA, just to tell everyone how wonderful it was going to be.
Now on MOTD, its all rolling eyes and "VAR again, eh Alan?"
A FEW, Sunderland obviously!, are clearly wrong, with not much to excuse them, but the vast majority are correct or like this one too close to say 100% one way or the other.
BUT 'football' won't accept that, so we're going down the ludicrous path of AI automatic ARs being trialled - madness! | | | |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 14:24 - Oct 4 with 1101 views | francisbowles |
| Scorching first half enough to see through QPR's latest City win - Report on 11:16 - Oct 4 by PinnerPaul |
The guy who annoys me more than anyone with this change of 'stance' is Gary Linekar.
He was saying exactly that pre VAR, he even did a 'puff piece' sycophantic interview with FIFA, just to tell everyone how wonderful it was going to be.
Now on MOTD, its all rolling eyes and "VAR again, eh Alan?"
A FEW, Sunderland obviously!, are clearly wrong, with not much to excuse them, but the vast majority are correct or like this one too close to say 100% one way or the other.
BUT 'football' won't accept that, so we're going down the ludicrous path of AI automatic ARs being trialled - madness! |
Yes, it has been good enough for over 150 years, so, 'if it aint broke don't fix it!' | | | |
| |
By continuing to use the site, you agree to our use of cookies and to abide by our Terms and Conditions.
