Please log in or register. Registered visitors get fewer ads.
Forum index | Previous Thread | Next thread
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? 21:12 - Apr 13 with 4044 viewsHoopsie

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site?


Your Vote:

You need to be logged in to vote on our site polls


Poll: WC Final 2026 - Your Pick for the Final Match-up

0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 21:14 - Apr 13 with 4012 viewsBrianMcCarthy

Loftus?


"The opposite of love, after all, is not hate, but indifference."
Poll: Player of the Year (so far)

2
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 22:20 - Apr 13 with 3839 viewsMick_S

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 21:14 - Apr 13 by BrianMcCarthy

Loftus?



I can not (apart from now) tell you how much that makes my tits itch. It really has to stop.

Did I ever mention that I was in Minder?

9
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 22:19 - Apr 14 with 3499 viewsHoopsie

One in 30 years opportunity to secure a site in the borough?

We missed so many opportunities, if this one past us by what other choices do we have left?

Poll: WC Final 2026 - Your Pick for the Final Match-up

0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 00:02 - Apr 15 with 3379 viewsDannyPaddox

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 22:19 - Apr 14 by Hoopsie

One in 30 years opportunity to secure a site in the borough?

We missed so many opportunities, if this one past us by what other choices do we have left?


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Relocate to Loftus. You know you want to.
0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 06:16 - Apr 15 with 3258 viewsMick_S

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 00:02 - Apr 15 by DannyPaddox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/

Relocate to Loftus. You know you want to.


“The town was formerly known as Lofthouse.”
[Post edited 15 Apr 6:29]

Did I ever mention that I was in Minder?

0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 06:30 - Apr 15 with 3212 viewsHammersmithR

It’s a no brainer. We have to do all we can to stay in the borough. We have missed so many opportunities over the years. QPR is not just about us and the here and now. We have to think about the future. We need a ground that can be enjoyed by future generations for another 100 years. You wouldn’t just stay in your own house and do nothing to it and just watch crumble and fall away. We have grown as a club. We have got the training ground which is only getting better. We now need the stadium and Old Oak can give us that.
1
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 08:45 - Apr 15 with 3075 viewsDannyPaddox

Most of all we need to make Nat Lofthouse Road a fortress. Sorry, New Lofthouse Road.
0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 09:14 - Apr 15 with 3021 viewsBlue_Castello

Perplexed why there is an option No love Loftus Road and I'll rather dig down, the subject has been discussed till the proverbial cows come home, as far as I can remember people with good knowledge of the construction industry have said it's a non starter.

Like many people I absolutely love Loftus Road and don't want us to move BUT I can see that for the club to progress we need a new stadium, we have to bite the bullet and move to a more modern stadium with better facilities.
0
Login to get fewer ads

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 09:16 - Apr 15 with 3017 viewsdmm

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 08:45 - Apr 15 by DannyPaddox

Most of all we need to make Nat Lofthouse Road a fortress. Sorry, New Lofthouse Road.


I think building regs would stop us from building a fortress. Although a motte-and-bailey style castle might get through.
1
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 09:40 - Apr 15 with 2959 viewsDaBurgh

Price is the same as 4 years and 2 months of what the owners have been paying to keep our heads above water. How long have they been doing this? 2, 3 years now?

When you reach the place beyond thoughts, the only thing you'll find is love and the only purpose of life becomes to ease the suffering of others.

0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 10:08 - Apr 15 with 2920 viewsdmm

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 09:40 - Apr 15 by DaBurgh

Price is the same as 4 years and 2 months of what the owners have been paying to keep our heads above water. How long have they been doing this? 2, 3 years now?


The owners have been financially supporting QPR since they took over from Tango and Cash. Back in 2019, it was calculated that the owners had pumped nearly a quarter of a billion (£244m) into the club, most of which was to cover operating losses of £139m.

Then, in the same year, there was the FFP fine of £17m plus costs of £3m, with payments spread over 10 years. The owners pledged to pay that.

There will be more to it than the above, but these are some figures I've noted.
0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 11:54 - Apr 15 with 2776 viewsSydneyRs

Now watch Chelsea go and grab it.
[Post edited 15 Apr 11:54]
0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 15:38 - Apr 15 with 2567 viewskensalriser

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 11:54 - Apr 15 by SydneyRs

Now watch Chelsea go and grab it.
[Post edited 15 Apr 11:54]


That would leave Scumford Bridge available, which would be plenty big enough for us.

Poll: QPR to finish 7th or Brentford to drop out of the top 6?

0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 16:01 - Apr 15 with 2543 viewsdmm

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 15:38 - Apr 15 by kensalriser

That would leave Scumford Bridge available, which would be plenty big enough for us.


You're such a WUM KR
0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 02:32 - Apr 16 with 2304 viewsSydneyRs

Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 15:38 - Apr 15 by kensalriser

That would leave Scumford Bridge available, which would be plenty big enough for us.


How very dare you!
0
Should QPR go for the CarGiant Site? on 07:24 - Apr 16 with 2173 viewsHastings_Hoops

Far more importantly - “should QPR wear that horrible pink kit at the Den” surely not?
1
About Us Contact Us Terms & Conditions Privacy Cookies Online Safety Advertising
© FansNetwork 2026