Hugill on 12:50 - Jul 28 with 4327 views | Northernr | Either he's going to have to take a wage cut, or more likely West Ham are going to have to swallow a percentage of his contract there to shift him. |  | |  |
Hugill on 13:19 - Jul 28 with 4106 views | terryb |
Hugill on 12:50 - Jul 28 by Northernr | Either he's going to have to take a wage cut, or more likely West Ham are going to have to swallow a percentage of his contract there to shift him. |
These are no more than rumour's, but it might hopefully be pointing towatds the price the club have in mind. 1) Tottenham have offered £20 million plus player/s. 2) Palace have offered £28 million. IF, and it's a big if, these offers are anywhere near to the truth, West Ham weould have to increase their valuation considerably from what social media has been quoting. I've also seen that a West Ham ITK is stating that we have agreed a deal with Palace & that The Hammers will have to match or improve on the Palace offer to sign him. It's probably all b******s, but it's a little bit different to the "we will sell him for peanuts" sentiments! EDIT The Palace offer of £28 million might be including add on's. [Post edited 28 Jul 2020 13:22]
|  | |  |
Hugill on 13:25 - Jul 28 with 4033 views | timcocking | I'd be very pleased to have him back, enjoyed his efforts on our behalf greatly. Whilst...mediocre on occasion, Jordan seems the sort of player who has a talismanic effect on us/him in the same way the likes of Jamie Mackie was inspirational for us without being brilliant per se. |  | |  |
Hugill on 13:31 - Jul 28 with 3988 views | LongsufferingR | Yeah after a lot of thought £28m + Hugill + 75% of Hugill's wages might do it |  | |  |
Hugill on 13:32 - Jul 28 with 3979 views | LazyFan | If Palace has met the price, then maybe QPR are going back and saying you can have Eze, if you throw in Hugs. Which would mean they would have to pay his contract off and he would have to accept our max contract of 10k per week for possibly a 2+1 option. Which he might do if he gets his big monies upfront. Not sure Wet Spam will do they deal though as its all got rather expensive if that's the case. Big IF's all round. |  |
|  |
Hugill on 13:32 - Jul 28 with 3979 views | PhilmyRs | If we can get around the £15/17m mark for Eze plus Hugill and Amos, it's not the worst bit of business in the world. I like Hugil and we desperately need a striker, not just in that mould, but a striker full stop. I also think we'll see a better Amos next season now he's got a full season under his belt. That would then leave decent funds for a physical defender, possible replacement for BOS (or an improved contract offer) a second loan striker and likely another defender and midfielder. Even taking into account Amos and Hugill on permanent deals, I'd still want a minimum of £15m for Eze and £20m+ if they're not part of any deal. |  | |  |
Hugill on 13:34 - Jul 28 with 3954 views | enfieldargh |
Hugill on 13:25 - Jul 28 by timcocking | I'd be very pleased to have him back, enjoyed his efforts on our behalf greatly. Whilst...mediocre on occasion, Jordan seems the sort of player who has a talismanic effect on us/him in the same way the likes of Jamie Mackie was inspirational for us without being brilliant per se. |
Agree (yes agree with TC ) Good old fashioned centre forward, mobile skillful, aggressive, brave and scored double figures...whats not to like. JUST DONT LEAN BACK JORDAN....maybe there was an issue when he was being baptised? If we sign him guaranteed Lee Hoos wont be breaking FFP. I always hoped that if we sold Eze & Bright we would realise at least £33 million |  |
|  |
Hugill on 13:44 - Jul 28 with 3865 views | daveB | Hugil back on loan makes a lot of sense |  | |  | Login to get fewer ads
Hugill on 13:45 - Jul 28 with 3856 views | DavieQPR | To my mind if we get Hugill and Amos in part exchange then on paper all we have done is lost Eze from last seasons squad. Thus we have gone backward. |  | |  |
Hugill on 13:52 - Jul 28 with 3800 views | enfieldargh |
Hugill on 13:45 - Jul 28 by DavieQPR | To my mind if we get Hugill and Amos in part exchange then on paper all we have done is lost Eze from last seasons squad. Thus we have gone backward. |
dont want to loose Eze but if we get Amos Hugill plus several others then we hopefully are making an improvement early days and more surprises to come |  |
|  |
Hugill on 13:52 - Jul 28 with 3798 views | BrianMcCarthy | If the rumour was £35m + Hugill +Amos (from two different clubs). I think we'd all digest that, and soon want more. It's just human nature. |  |
|  |
Hugill on 13:53 - Jul 28 with 3789 views | Northernr |
Hugill on 13:44 - Jul 28 by daveB | Hugil back on loan makes a lot of sense |
Nah Dave, if they want him, and there's other interest, then they can swallow a chunk of Hugill's wage and we'll have him permanently please. Sick of being screwed over by West bloody Ham. |  | |  |
Hugill on 13:57 - Jul 28 with 3758 views | Metallica_Hoop | I'd have him back, great at this level even if he does mess up a bit. I remember Sammy 'f'kin' Koejoe upfront for us (just checked ) 33 games 3 goals. What I remember most clearly about him was he was utter gash. [Post edited 28 Jul 2020 13:59]
|  |
| Beer and Beef has made us what we are - The Prince Regent |
|  |
Hugill on 13:58 - Jul 28 with 3752 views | NorthantsHoop | Hope the club get this deal right. Would think £20m plus Hugill would be good, but his wages are a problem. If Palace are serious then £25m at least. They lost out on Bowen to the Hammers and may be about to really splash the cash. Not so sure about this add on stuff and payment installments. Only have a sell on percentage. If the fee is £25m probably be 10%, if £20m a bit higher. But this is Rangers so who knows how it will go. [Post edited 28 Jul 2020 14:00]
|  | |  |
Hugill on 14:05 - Jul 28 with 3689 views | A40Bosh |
Hugill on 13:45 - Jul 28 by DavieQPR | To my mind if we get Hugill and Amos in part exchange then on paper all we have done is lost Eze from last seasons squad. Thus we have gone backward. |
Sorry Davie, but I think that over simplifies the situation and you cannot say we have gone backwards until we see what that money brings in over the next few windows. This has to be about the medium term, not just the start of next season. If we get anything over £15m for Eze and around £5 million for BOS, then what we have done is realised an additional £20m in income as a football club and that is massive for us and is a huge step forwards. When Evil Les and Hoos talk about us being a promote and sell on the youth, they are not talking about for one season, this is going to be the new norm unless something dramatically changes and we fluke a promotion next year, then do not spunk all the Sky money on has been money grabbers like last time and manage to reinvest sensibly. The squad does have to be strengthened to ensure we do not go down, but I would want us to buy Hugill for a sensible price and not loan him back. The last thing we want is for him to be firing on all cylinders, score 10 before Nov and the find the Hammers cash in and sell him on to another Championship club, like happened with Wells last year. Hugill will do a job and needs more than the one season to prove he is going to be a good investment. Amos I am not sure about but if he does come back then Warbs and co must see something there. |  |
|  |
Hugill on 14:11 - Jul 28 with 3647 views | Match82 |
Hugill on 13:45 - Jul 28 by DavieQPR | To my mind if we get Hugill and Amos in part exchange then on paper all we have done is lost Eze from last seasons squad. Thus we have gone backward. |
Well yes, but with £15m or whatever in the bank! And I'd assume we would reinvest some of that. We also have a very young team all of whom are a year older and more experienced. Look at Chair, Masterson, Kakay vs this time last year. |  | |  |
Hugill on 14:35 - Jul 28 with 3528 views | PinnerPaul |
Hugill on 13:32 - Jul 28 by PhilmyRs | If we can get around the £15/17m mark for Eze plus Hugill and Amos, it's not the worst bit of business in the world. I like Hugil and we desperately need a striker, not just in that mould, but a striker full stop. I also think we'll see a better Amos next season now he's got a full season under his belt. That would then leave decent funds for a physical defender, possible replacement for BOS (or an improved contract offer) a second loan striker and likely another defender and midfielder. Even taking into account Amos and Hugill on permanent deals, I'd still want a minimum of £15m for Eze and £20m+ if they're not part of any deal. |
Amos is a Tottenham player or have I misread your post? |  | |  |
Hugill on 15:29 - Jul 28 with 3283 views | BazzeR | Wells 15 goals in 18 games probably no re sale value Hugill 15 goals in 42 games possible re sale value Both players are valued at £5m Wells for me all day long. Better value out there than Hugill...Kieffer Moore being an example. |  | |  |
Hugill on 15:39 - Jul 28 with 3211 views | gazza1 | I am not over keen on Hugill but he does work hard, good team player and doesnt shirk his responsibilities and most importantly has scored a few goals even though he has missed a lot more.......not sure if we could afford any better so he is a big option for us. Loan or buy is most dependent on West Ham - anything more than £2 million is too much plus his wages need to be in line with the structure we have in place. Loan is a waste of money in many ways but may be the option we take depending on other players we may buy. |  | |  |
Hugill on 16:22 - Jul 28 with 3009 views | Northolt_Rs |
Hugill on 14:35 - Jul 28 by PinnerPaul | Amos is a Tottenham player or have I misread your post? |
And he is total gash..... |  |
| Scooters, Tunes, Trainers and QPR. |
|  |
Hugill on 17:11 - Jul 28 with 2813 views | A40Bosh |
Hugill on 15:39 - Jul 28 by gazza1 | I am not over keen on Hugill but he does work hard, good team player and doesnt shirk his responsibilities and most importantly has scored a few goals even though he has missed a lot more.......not sure if we could afford any better so he is a big option for us. Loan or buy is most dependent on West Ham - anything more than £2 million is too much plus his wages need to be in line with the structure we have in place. Loan is a waste of money in many ways but may be the option we take depending on other players we may buy. |
If we can't get Hugill on a perm then we should look elsewhere to get someone tried and tested on a perm and cannot be recalled at any point. Unless Warbs picks team based on a formation best suited to match the opposition and size and set up and he has just been unlucky to not get more games, then I don't understand why Oteh did not get more games than he actually did, albeit it did not impress when given the chance. If the defence is as bang awful again next season then we have to have fire power upfront end of |  |
|  |
Hugill on 17:30 - Jul 28 with 2722 views | ted_hendrix | Last season we scored 67 goals the 5th highest scoring club in the division, alas we conceded 76 goals only two other clubs conceded more goals than us the permanently ill Hull City and Luton. I'll be delighted if we sign Hugill but even more delighted If we can sort out our quite dreadful defense. I'm quite sure the glaringly obvious failing on the pitch is one that the club will be doing its best to sort out in the coming weeks, as our finances dictate of course. |  |
| My Father had a profound influence on me, he was a lunatic. |
|  |
Hugill on 17:35 - Jul 28 with 2688 views | rsonist | I don't know if I see Hugill's wages as that big of an obstacle. He could sit out his contract if he were so inclined but he's 28 now and he seems the type to rather play. And I doubt anyone else will come in for him that would blow us out of the water competitively or financially (maybe a return to Preston would appeal though). Not going to speculate on the Eze bidding other than to say it would be negligent not to bide our time and use Palace to drive up the price. Now Zaha wants to go their desperation and cash to spend is exactly the situation we've been waiting to take advantage of. (Not quite seeing who will actually spend big on Zaha right now mind but nevertheless). I like the idea of Hugill and Moore together. Chances of it happening seem to be receding but with the boy Thomas it looks like the general emphasis is on something a bit brawnier. |  | |  |
Hugill on 17:46 - Jul 28 with 2630 views | kensalriser | If Palace really have offered £28m, I expect to see in short order a photo of Eze on the pitch at Selhurst holding a Palace scarf. |  |
|  |
Hugill on 17:47 - Jul 28 with 2622 views | Northernr |
Hugill on 17:35 - Jul 28 by rsonist | I don't know if I see Hugill's wages as that big of an obstacle. He could sit out his contract if he were so inclined but he's 28 now and he seems the type to rather play. And I doubt anyone else will come in for him that would blow us out of the water competitively or financially (maybe a return to Preston would appeal though). Not going to speculate on the Eze bidding other than to say it would be negligent not to bide our time and use Palace to drive up the price. Now Zaha wants to go their desperation and cash to spend is exactly the situation we've been waiting to take advantage of. (Not quite seeing who will actually spend big on Zaha right now mind but nevertheless). I like the idea of Hugill and Moore together. Chances of it happening seem to be receding but with the boy Thomas it looks like the general emphasis is on something a bit brawnier. |
If a footballer is on, say £37,000 a week, and the club that wants to buy him has a wage ceiling of, say £20,000 a week (and doesn't even want to pay that really) then player is not moving from A to B and without somebody somewhere budging, and it's rarely the player. West Ham will have to take the £17k difference, add it up over the rest of his deal, and pay him a portion of it, otherwise he'll sit there and go out on loan until the deal is up. |  | |  |
| |