4 years for Hamalainen on 11:38 - Oct 22 with 3531 views | Hunterhoop | I wonder if that’s why we haven’t seen him yet this season, and why me might on Saturday! | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:41 - Oct 22 with 3519 views | francisbowles |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:38 - Oct 22 by Hunterhoop | I wonder if that’s why we haven’t seen him yet this season, and why me might on Saturday! |
Yep as soon as Dieng signed he was in the starting line up. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:42 - Oct 22 with 3508 views | Juzzie | Does he get time off for good behaviour? | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:47 - Oct 22 with 3482 views | davman |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:38 - Oct 22 by Hunterhoop | I wonder if that’s why we haven’t seen him yet this season, and why me might on Saturday! |
Yep, but still really, really confusing why BOS is given a stay of execution. | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:49 - Oct 22 with 3465 views | BrianMcCarthy | Good for him. They must rate him highly. | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:57 - Oct 22 with 3431 views | LazyFan |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:47 - Oct 22 by davman | Yep, but still really, really confusing why BOS is given a stay of execution. |
They want BOS to stay and they think he will sign very soon. BOS should sign as he could get an injury tomorrow and then nobody may take the risk if its a long term one. As we have seen with poor Amos these things happen. Lums can probably get away with it, but I am not sure an outfield player can. Also, BOS has not played any better than anyone else, Uncle and Willock could come in. He may get dropped if he's not careful. I expect him to sign soon. Back to Hams, not sure he's ready. But he should be on the subs bench and maybe its time to see what he can do. Otherwise why did we bother with a 4- year deal. | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:58 - Oct 22 with 3427 views | daveB |
4 years for Hamalainen on 11:47 - Oct 22 by davman | Yep, but still really, really confusing why BOS is given a stay of execution. |
because we get compensation for him and talks are ongoing so leaving him out would be pointless. With Manning talks had broken down and it was made clear he will leave on a free so they left him out | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:00 - Oct 22 with 3410 views | Northernr | Wrestled to the ground and forced to sign at about 21.45 last night. | | | | Login to get fewer ads
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:28 - Oct 22 with 3306 views | sprocket |
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:00 - Oct 22 by Northernr | Wrestled to the ground and forced to sign at about 21.45 last night. |
| | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:42 - Oct 22 with 3251 views | californiahoop |
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:00 - Oct 22 by Northernr | Wrestled to the ground and forced to sign at about 21.45 last night. |
Lol, pleased for him and Kakay, both should have been last season. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:42 - Oct 22 with 3251 views | dannyblue | He must be cheap! | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 13:08 - Oct 22 with 3126 views | bosh67 | Great, he can push Wallace's chair around the park on Saturday. | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 13:14 - Oct 22 with 3095 views | BrianMcCarthy |
Quality from Lunar Jetman. | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 13:22 - Oct 22 with 3053 views | francisbowles | McIntyre seems to be well ahead of the game here as it's still not on the offy. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 13:41 - Oct 22 with 3003 views | BklynRanger |
4 years for Hamalainen on 13:22 - Oct 22 by francisbowles | McIntyre seems to be well ahead of the game here as it's still not on the offy. |
Coming up 'page not found' now on the link. Maybe Niko's escaped, headed for the border? Get after him Les. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 14:04 - Oct 22 with 2954 views | ted_hendrix | I've only ever seen him play in the flesh twice, my thoughts were Hmmm well okay nothing special there. That might have been about 14 years ago, seems like he's been here for ages, If he walked past me in the street I wouldn't know who he was. Give him the LB slot on Saturday, bet he gives a penalty or two away. | |
| My Father had a profound influence on me, he was a lunatic. |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 15:49 - Oct 22 with 2756 views | bosh67 | Do we really need a left back though? Is a left back not old hat these days? Should it not be a right footed player who's either good in the air or has a sparkling personality? In this world of equality or equal rights does it even need to be a player with two legs? | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 16:06 - Oct 22 with 2710 views | Phildo |
4 years for Hamalainen on 15:49 - Oct 22 by bosh67 | Do we really need a left back though? Is a left back not old hat these days? Should it not be a right footed player who's either good in the air or has a sparkling personality? In this world of equality or equal rights does it even need to be a player with two legs? |
We tried Braveheart first but we got the Mel Gibson p1ssed upside down in a taxi version of Braveheart | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 16:40 - Oct 22 with 2626 views | losethedrum |
4 years for Hamalainen on 12:00 - Oct 22 by Northernr | Wrestled to the ground and forced to sign at about 21.45 last night. |
Was he wrestled to the ground by the captain of Glasgow Rangers ? | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 17:31 - Oct 22 with 2541 views | londonscottish |
4 years for Hamalainen on 14:04 - Oct 22 by ted_hendrix | I've only ever seen him play in the flesh twice, my thoughts were Hmmm well okay nothing special there. That might have been about 14 years ago, seems like he's been here for ages, If he walked past me in the street I wouldn't know who he was. Give him the LB slot on Saturday, bet he gives a penalty or two away. |
If he's a modern left back/wing back I wouldn't worry about that. He'll be 100 yards away at the oppo's corner flag most of the time. | |
| |
4 years for Hamalainen on 17:42 - Oct 22 with 2514 views | stevec | He’s 23, been here 6 years and made one appearance yet somehow is then granted a 4 year contract. Can someone explain modern football to me please? | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 17:49 - Oct 22 with 2491 views | Northernr |
4 years for Hamalainen on 17:42 - Oct 22 by stevec | He’s 23, been here 6 years and made one appearance yet somehow is then granted a 4 year contract. Can someone explain modern football to me please? |
Similar with Shodipo. Big question marks. Wonder if they’ve been spooked by the Manning/BOS situations. If we’d given BOS 4 years 18 months ago it would have looked daft. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 18:26 - Oct 22 with 2433 views | stevec |
4 years for Hamalainen on 17:49 - Oct 22 by Northernr | Similar with Shodipo. Big question marks. Wonder if they’ve been spooked by the Manning/BOS situations. If we’d given BOS 4 years 18 months ago it would have looked daft. |
Yeah true, I’d love to know how these contracts work. Do they offer him a grand a week basic, bonuses if he plays first team, I could live with that but if he’s on say four grand a week at this stage of his career you’d have to wonder what’s going on behind the scenes. I suppose if we offered him a contract at a grand a week then loaned him out at two grand a week, then everyone’s a winner. Does sound a bit iffy. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 18:28 - Oct 22 with 2431 views | Northernr |
4 years for Hamalainen on 18:26 - Oct 22 by stevec | Yeah true, I’d love to know how these contracts work. Do they offer him a grand a week basic, bonuses if he plays first team, I could live with that but if he’s on say four grand a week at this stage of his career you’d have to wonder what’s going on behind the scenes. I suppose if we offered him a contract at a grand a week then loaned him out at two grand a week, then everyone’s a winner. Does sound a bit iffy. |
If you’re getting a contract at qpr atm it is heavily weighted towards appearances, wins and league position. Probably why manning wouldn’t sign it - low basic. | | | |
4 years for Hamalainen on 18:31 - Oct 22 with 2421 views | BrianMcCarthy |
4 years for Hamalainen on 18:28 - Oct 22 by Northernr | If you’re getting a contract at qpr atm it is heavily weighted towards appearances, wins and league position. Probably why manning wouldn’t sign it - low basic. |
Plus, the bonuses for him would have included clean sheet bonuses, so...y'know... | |
| |
| |